Close enough to the truth. To even approach being conservative in a system that feeds your narcissism constantly, you need to be aware your shit can stink. I'm not talking about AWFLs who are conservative because their sugar daddy is.
They don't need to kick out their kid. They need to stop paying for that kid to go to college. I 100% guarantee they were raised pretty well, but then the kid went to college and got infected by the woke mind virus. Since they're talking about a BA and being an undergrad, this person must have gotten past the associates milestone. Since universities require some woke courses for 1st and 2nd year students now, I have zero doubt that the brainwashing has started.
Make that trans "brother" go find out how hard it is to work as a bus boy. Let that trans "brother" find out how much the attractive greeter makes, doing way less gross work and services. Let that trans "brother" find out how much in tips the waitresses get. I have zero doubt he'll want to be a she, again.
I think they're not wanting the eldest to take it's siblings to the car to engage in prohibited activities. Especially since the car contents fall under the legal responsibility of the title holder while parked on their property. Anything illicit that gets found in there is going to be assumed to be property of title holder.
What's wild is how she thinks that dating needs to get better for her gender. They have the pick of the litter on social media, any dating apps, and any dating website. Endless sympathy if anything bad happens, default custody if kids are involved, and it is socially acceptable for them to just crank through guys to get a free meal each and every night of the week.
What ruins her dating world? The idea that a guy might not go one by one, but I assume she thinks there is no such need for girls to.
So lemme get this right.
AWDTSG. = Are we dating the same guy.
Social media affluent sciz-hoe chicks mad that men are probably dating around the same way they are, and they want to put a stop to guys having options.
Meanwhile, I'm pretty sure there isn't a bro-code group where guys are alerting each other to the fact that the girl is rotating free meal tickets.
That about the size of it? The only thing I truly hate about this is I bet a lot of girls who get broken up with, they're going to put their ex-boyfriends up as pieces of shit and it wont be true at all.
In fact, if a guy is on a dating app and managing to pull puss at such an advanced rate, I imagine that hoes mad that they're all after a top 20%er and that a 20%er isn't fucking around when it comes to finding a good match. Sucks getting treated like you're disposable, right ladies?
The response limit / reset is to prevent reasoning the AI into proving a point. I'd bet there is a character limit too. To prevent big prompts like DAN. Every statement it initially makes is a statement that likely follows it's SJW guidelines. So say you start feeding it a chain of hypothetical rhetorical questions after getting it to spoon feed you relevant real world statistics running parallel to your hypothetical. When you ask it to give you a new answer based upon it's previous rule-abiding answers, it might just commit a thought crime.
I'd be willing to bet they paid people to try to jailbreak it and then took metrics on how many prompts it took, on average, to accomplish it. It probably took around 25 or 30 steps, and so the designers put the logic limit to 15 as a margin of safety.
Reminder that "Born this way" came from a think tank who's sole purpose was to counteract the then-successful christian campaign that was using the slogan "Poor life choice", highlighting how choosing to engage in homosexuality put somebody at greater risk of poverty, disease, childlessness and loneliness.
Not that I have a dog in the fight, but it would've been nice if there was a nugget of scientific truth to it... but instead we got a reaction/fabrication and any science backing it up after the fact was made-to-order NuScience.
He's running a pyramid scheme basically.
That said, the only reason they give a shit is because Andrew Tate speaks too many truths about the mindset and socially trained behavior of modern American women and the scientific fact that is hypergamy. It's become cool to dunk on the dude and mock his takes in clips just as much as it's become cool to promote him since promoting him gets you more pyramid scheme money, literally speaking.
Registered just to reply because I get you. You don't have options here.
Redman, the number one thing they found with blood clots and all the other systemic inflammation issues is that the root cause of that was that the person administering did not avoid major vessels. It's a process called aspiration.
Aspiration is when the provider puts the needle in, draws back on the syringe, and waits a moment to see if blood emerges into the syringe. If so, they start over at a new injection site. This is NOT standard practice in America.
In countries where aspiration is mandatory, they haven't had a single person turn up with clots.
Why?
When they deliver the medicine directly into a vein, or into an area overly dense with capillaries, it goes straight into the major circulatory systems. The chemicals in the vaccine cause thrombocytes(platelet) to detonate and shoot out their webby guts. The webby guts normally stop bleeding, and instead, make a blood clot. The bloodclots clog up places all over the body, causing those major problems you hear of.
Further, your immune system is fighting the immune training component of the shot all over your entire body, instead of just one area. This is a lot more taxing on your organs and nerves.
When the shot is delivered properly, into an area of muscle or fat where there isn't excessive access to veins and arteries, it is a localized inflammatory response and blood clots that form in a muscle will get broken down and dissolved safely.
If the administrator doesn't know what aspirating the shot is, you need to tell the provider to stop and tell your mother than you want them to get someone else to give you the shot because the original party isn't skilled enough to be allowed to.
Sadly, just about anyone who works for a drug store or grocery store pharmacy is being allowed to administer these things. :(
I'll take 90% free speech over 0% free speech. The platform you're asking for is too radical to exist right now and we have to progress in that direction. We can't warp there. The left go away with so much because they were willing to slow-walk, and make manifest the slippery slope.
We have to slippery slope ourselves back to free speech absolutism.