3
evilplushie 3 points ago +3 / -0

That or you somehow have a higher neutral party that will step in and prevent those tactics from being used or punish you for using it. No such thing in this war

13
evilplushie 13 points ago +13 / -0

The problem is social media and especially women on social media. You don't need to tweet everything out for social validation dopamine

9
evilplushie 9 points ago +9 / -0

I see this as cold warfare. If one side says no we can't use this very effective tactic while the other side uses it relentlessly, then that first side is just going to lose barring a miracle. It's like if one side just stuck to swords when facing guns

10
evilplushie 10 points ago +10 / -0

I disagree. Ultimately you also need the grunts to just stop with their threats not the corporations. To do that you need to target the grunts

1
evilplushie 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the increase in security already happened since they knew this for a month already?

14
evilplushie 14 points ago +14 / -0

Woman got fired from home depot for wishing the shooter didn't miss and celebrating the shooting

11
evilplushie 11 points ago +11 / -0

yep, i'm rooting for her and reposting on x to spread it

11
evilplushie 11 points ago +11 / -0

The issue isn't whether the right can use it but that some people still play prefer it not be used against the left

3
evilplushie 3 points ago +4 / -1

I disagree. If anything Matt should be taking greater umbrage at dailywire pushing Nala as a repentant christian. The whole reason he's against Amber Rose is because of his christian values, same reason as why he's against anime and music etc. I have no issues with that because he's allowed to dislike whores who go against his christian values

However, where were his christian values and christian outrage when Dailywire platformed Nala and pushed her as a repentent christian and basically mocked and denigrated people who doubted her and pointed out all the parts of her story that didn't make sense? Like how she was supposedly converted months ago but only deactivated her OF days before the interview? How she was STILL dressed in her OF whore costume when she did the interview. How she was still using the OF whore name because NALA REY is not her real name.

Where was that christian outrage? I would be more offended if I had a hand in pushing a fucking whore as a repentent christian than a fucking whore admitting she's a fucking whore but at a political rally

9
evilplushie 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well multiple ppl did tell him to tone it down. But he doubled down instead

11
evilplushie 11 points ago +11 / -0

Think several people tried reporting him to x to demonetize him. Not sure how that went

2
evilplushie 2 points ago +2 / -0

i've never given her money. Im pointing out matt walsh is being retarded when his own company pushed an OF whore as a born again christian and he said NOTHING during that

13
evilplushie 13 points ago +13 / -0

There's no sense in being honourable when your enemies have no issues using that weapon to KILL you

3
evilplushie 3 points ago +5 / -2

Uh, no. Because one isn't being pushed as a christian message. And Nala stopped it days before her interview with Knowles while claiming to have repented months before.

I rather have someone who admits she's a fucking whore than have christians push someone they claim is no longer a fucking whore, but is still dressed as one and refuse to listen to any doubts about her

Stop being a cuck

10
evilplushie 10 points ago +11 / -1

Nala was still on OF until a few days before she appeared on the Knowles show. People who pointed this out or were skeptical were met with disdain from people who claimed god saves whores. Which no one was denying, just doubt that this particular fucking whore was saved.

Unless RNC is pushing Amber as a born again christian (which she herself admits she's not), it's not even close

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›