0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hope you don't get falsely accused of rape or get divorced if you decide to marry

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fair enough. I'm just saying that sex workers are in some way useful; to prevent false rape accusations and for sex without attachment

-2
browarrior1950 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I'm not as I'm not American but I'm just saying that he's not the devil like you guys make him out to be.

1
browarrior1950 1 point ago +2 / -1

"It's something from 'popular culture', which is best ignored"

I'll try from now on, but we get bombarded no matter where we go

-1
browarrior1950 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I've never been a SJW, I despise them. I think I might be a MGTOW though but not 100% sure

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

The problem with that metaphor is that it ignores the danger of marriage: divorce and other issues e.g. abuse, being cucked by the woman

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

Maybe but it's still a big risk. If someone gave you a bowl of M&Ms and said one of them had poison in it, would you still take one?

-7
browarrior1950 -7 points ago +4 / -11

Jesus Christ, no need for an essay

2
browarrior1950 2 points ago +3 / -1

Prostitution was a thing before marriage. People have always wanted sex without attachment. Even if women were 100% loyal and would never divorce, there would still be prostitutes

-3
browarrior1950 -3 points ago +10 / -13

No thank you. No one should believe in fairy tales

5
browarrior1950 5 points ago +6 / -1

" Wait until they can legally charge people for the privilege of being treated nicely"

It's called marriage.

People should have the right to have sex without attachment. Marriage/hook ups are too dangerous in modern times so prostitution is a safer alternative.

2
browarrior1950 2 points ago +5 / -3

I'm single af and I have never been in a serious relationship thank God for that

3
browarrior1950 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's better how it's done in Europe with the brothels instead of a risky method in the UK or US. People should be able to have sex without having to be in a relationship and risk getting divorce raped or have a one night stand and risk getting accused of rape.

2
browarrior1950 2 points ago +3 / -1

You can easily avoid that by not using them. If you get married and you are with the wrong woman, good luck escaping without losing at least 50% of your assets

7
browarrior1950 7 points ago +11 / -4

"I'm pretty sure everyone on this sub knows I regard "sex workers" as manipulative subhuman scum that are less valuable to humanity than amoeba."

they are more honest than the average woman who lie and pretend to love you so they can steal your money in the divorce.

1
browarrior1950 1 point ago +9 / -8

What's wrong with sex workers? At least they are honest: they want your money for sex unlike the average woman who state that money doesn't matter while awaiting their eventual divorce settlement.

3
browarrior1950 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's a proven fact, people are treated better if you're attractive, this is real Discrimination™.

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

"treat people as individuals instead of as a group"

What's wrong with that?

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

What will you do about it? What exilde said is correct: treat people as individuals instead of as a group

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Hitler was attacked by propaganda across the world pretty much from day one, before he did any of the really bad stuff." I agree with that.

"As for Bolshevik infiltration, use your imagination. Think of it like hostile priests converting your populace; always an act of war in the past. Were there just simultaneous communist movements all around the world like, by accident or something? "Workers of the World Unite" and "World Revolution" mean what they mean. Gee I don't know why red china, USSR, Castro's Cuba, and all these other pinko countries all spontaneously organized together towards the common goal of destroying the west. I guess you're right though, there's no evidence."

I'm not disagreeing but all the countries you mentioned where in turmoil. China because of being humiliated by Japan in WW2 and the West in the boxing rebellion and the previous century. USSR, got in power because of Imperial Germany's blunder and because of the incompetence of the Royal Family especially in the war with Japan and WW1. Don't know much about Cuba though

0
browarrior1950 0 points ago +1 / -1

He brought it on himself! By invading West Europe he had to deal with Britain and France, he should have just armed his country against the inevitable Soviet invasion instead of attacking Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Since he did, Britain had to get involved and they would do anything to get the US on their side.

"Bolsheviks were actively infiltrating and subverting all of these countries" Evidence?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›