3
The_Frag_Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think before you do anything, the first thing you need to do is to clear some of the energy you have now.. chill out and clear your head. You seem a bit rattled, so take some time to re center yourself. That's my advice.

2
The_Frag_Man 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to think she was cute

2
The_Frag_Man 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just so I can be clear about the rule, let me give an example. Suppose that there is a conversation about mass immigration in Europe, may I present for discussion the famous Barbara Spectre interview video?

3
The_Frag_Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay, but what if there is a group of conspiring Jews? Are you allowed to talk about that? Or what if there might be, and you want to talk about the evidence. Will you remove posts containing evidence of a conspiracy? Are conspiracies allowed?

5
The_Frag_Man 5 points ago +5 / -0

A new hope!

6
The_Frag_Man 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good job India! Thank you for doing the needful!

3
The_Frag_Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't be like "I'm glad those kids in CHAZ got shot!".

Why?

11
The_Frag_Man 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'll always argue that the fewer the rules, the better.

I agree. Let people make use of the downvote button if they don't like something. We don't need to be coddled.

2
The_Frag_Man 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes. Yes, the Elders of Zion and other such intentionally fabricated documents fall into this.

What if you wanted to discuss it? Is this rule about misleading the user base, or about excluding some topics of discussion?

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as ... participating in a vast conspiracy to take over the world, ala ZOG-NWO / The Patriarchy.

Why? What if you clarify that "The Jews" is not referring to "All Jews"?