0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +3 / -3

Exactly. You get people to have kids by giving them a world where they want to.

Attacking and dehumanizing men who don't is stupid even from a natalist standpoint, but they don't care because they think the feminists will help them.

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +6 / -5

Hmm...the way the establishment in the UK has been pushing the "misogyny" hoax, I wonder if this is predictive programming.

That something will happen to her, it will be blamed on an "incel" and the women's lobby will use it to heavily oppress single men.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'm not Jewish. What the hell do I have to do or say to prove that?

My positions are ideologically consistent, yours are an absolute mess.

The majority of feminism is pro-"Palestine", this is because feminists have hated Jews for over a century.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Macron literally went on stage suggesting that childless men should be denied joys because they aren't serving the global goals.

It was a headline on Bloomberg, it caused Ubisoft stock to plummet that day!

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +1 / -3

let's take the same side as the feminists are

And you wonder why I have such an incredibly low opinion of your side.

If someone formed an ideology explicitly designed to make us subservient to women, it would just be yours.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

The famously white Taiwanese. Unhinged as hell take.

What all those countries have in common is a love of oppressing the male population.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +3 / -13

I'm not trying to prevent births. People who want kids will have them, people who don't shouldn't be forced to.

Why are you lining up with the WEF establishment, who also pushed the idea of taking rights from single men who won't procreate?

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +3 / -3

It's not really criticizing women if he's pushing us to play happy families with threats to our rights.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +2 / -11

He backed giving them less of a vote and doubled down on it recently. The women's lobby are pumping up the "cat ladies" comment as a distraction.

I'm 100% sure of it, by looking at the data, that the kind of policy Vance wants is going to send the GOP to the political wilderness. Pro-family pandering worked decades ago when feminism wasn't so obviously present.

The only reason that the GOP is winning in polls is because young men have switched in high numbers. The same reason the PPP won in South Korea.

The PPP waited until after they cashed in the votes to turn their back on those who helped them. Vance has already stated it plainly.

Anyone who spoke at the Brookings Institute is a bad fucking candidate! Brookings is swamp!

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

Ah, but most of the natalists like Vance hate the idea of spending less money.

They just want to spend more money on the failed experiment of bribing people to have kids, which everyone knows doesn't work because South Korea already tried it.

We wouldn't need an aggressive birth policy if those in charge actually had any economic intelligence. The welfare/social security etc Ponzi will crash down eventually. The best you can do is prop it up for those close to needing it and slowly phase it out.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

You agreed that he should shut up. Implying you know that this wedge issue is never going to win anything.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +2 / -10

You finally admit that "single men are the enemy" rhetoric doesn't work?

Part of me wonders if Vance and infamous shill Richard Reeves have ever met.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Funny you should mention their lack of profitability. Disney's jump from announcing a stake in Epic has been completely erased and the trend is once again towards the 52W low, setting a new 2024 low at the end of Thursday trading.

I'm expecting a bounce when Deadpool and Wolverine does well, before a return to the usual downtrend.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +3 / -8

I think an underrated attack is to bring up her selective prosecution of black men for non-violent crime.

The black voting block is not as cohesive as it seems.

I predict Kamala will be playing the "misogyny" card every two minutes in the debate, because she wants to keep it on moral/personality issues rather than her awful record.

Team Trump needs to hit her hard on her constant failures.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +6 / -15

Speak it quietly...JD Vance needs to shut up or we will lose.

It's easy to bring up cheating, but Vance is attacking the main groups who switched from Democrats to GOP. Young men and childless men.

I'm sure I'll get a lot of flak for bringing this up, but it's something Trump absolutely needs to address - a pro-family platform will lose hard.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +4 / -6

Blaming porn for why men don't want women is a cop-out.

Nobody wants to be voluntarily oppressed.

I hope he's grown and matured, particularly as The Sisterhood™ will be the number one enemy of an incoming Trump administration.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

The other side uses young boys as child soldiers.

Jewish/Israel

Yeah, that's your line. You don't have an actual logical reason to stand with women, so just project harder than anyone has ever projected before.

By the way...isn't it weird your female masters also hate Israel?

There has never been something as astroturfed as unity between us and them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›