Yes, and if you read my comment, you'll understand why.
They want violence. They want an excuse to go to Step 7.
Feminists want that. They want us to get violent so they can escalate their rhetoric.
Feminism passes all six Stanton genocide tests, which were approved by the US State Department in 1994 as a way to monitor the rise of ideologies that could commit genocide.
Classification : "The problem is men."
Symbolization : "Men are born with bias against women" This is ironically projection.
Dehumanization : #KillAllMen, "Crush the Patriarchy", various media articles stating hating men is good from mainstream media.
Organization : The push for female representation.
Polarization : The idea that everyone who opposes women is an "incel" who is a threat to society.
Preparation : Laws created to defend women who kill men.
Missing : Extermination and Denial.
These steps are based off the rise of the ideology that led to the Rwandan Genocide.
Exactly. They call it child support.
There is absolutely no legal requirement it is spent on the child.
I'm surprised she isn't lesbian.
I kind of already did, but I guess I can do it again.
It is an increasing trend in finance as ESG and investments boards tip over the 51% female mark to offer reduced rate credit lines on the condition of reducing the amount of men the company hires.
NatWest, alongside Barclays, is the UK branch of this plan.
This target envisages 37% of women in executive positions in the company by 2027. This way, Telefónica is moving towards 40% of executive positions being held by women by 2030.
including Natwest as Agent and BNP Paribas as sustainable coordinator, with legal advice from Clifford Chance.
NatWest is one of the key institutions that's part of the More Feminine Way's banking manipulation plan.
They systematically offered loans secured on lowering male hires, and those records likely can't be destroyed. He just took possession of the land where the metaphorical bodies are buried, and the enemy is scared.
I guarantee her reasoning is BS and more kids die by women's hand in infanticide than from guns.
Average of ~30 a month in the US.
Do CuntPro and we'd all be happier.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Feminists get what they deserve.
Remember when women tried to ban To Kill a Mockingbird?
You sound like fucking Borat.
What...what language is this?
If you actually believe that retard is in charge, I've got some prime Crimean real estate to sell you.
A snake devouring its own tail is still not two opposing animals.
Someone tell the TERF strap-on suckers here.
TERF and "TRA" are the same thing from a different angle.
They stood up and fought where it counted, and Kotick doubled down recently saying they should have never stopped appealing. The case was based on nothing.
still loves Blizzard, because California suing them over alleged sexual harassment a while back has put them on his mental “enemies of feminism” list.
My enemy's enemy...
So we just have to die for this pro-woman world to keep oppressing us? Fuck no.
Their country. Their benefit. Their blood.
Not comparable. Physical strength is barely relevance in modern war.
That's not what I'm implying. It's just weird that that study has existed since March, and I've posted it on X only recently, and suddenly it's everywhere.
You laugh, but the enemy taking over yet another culturally significant thing (most popular game in the world) is not a good thing.
No, Satan worshippers are a thing that exist solely in the heads of retarded tradcons. People can be evil without following a ridiculous ideology.
No, the main reason you keep women out of war is to appease corrupt feminist regimes/because you are a corrupt feminist regime.
Exactly, women are so good at everything, they should go fight.
We can jump to extremes, but neither of us wants to live like the Amish.
In a regular society that isn't either community based or extremely theocratic, there's no way to change women's behavior, and even then, I wouldn't say it always works.
Stop derailing my posts.