As I already said, they aren't.
The people who care about women's sports and the people who support abortion is a circle.
Those who actually vote GOP think women's sports are a waste of money and time, this was common knowledge literally 5 years ago.
It's so hard to debate without breaking Rule 16. I feel neutered.
Oh, don't get me started on fucking KPIs.
I could give a rant about that, that would break Rule 16 so much I'd be banned for life.
I'm saying if you pander to feminism, you can't.
They're the same people. You just notice them more because you're on the receiving end.
Because they omitted the actual popular option - stop wasting people's money on women's sports!
The people most rabid about this issue are also pro-abortion. It's a vote losing issue.
Not because of what it is, but what it signals to people.
Can you talk about anything without invoking Jews?
The reason why immigration is such an issue is because someone has to fund Social Security in the future, and birth rates keep falling because men are avoiding women (correctly).
I'm also convinced that these dating and lifestyle podcasts operated by Muslims are a glowie op because it's part of the same tactic of ideologies trying to manipulate young men
Did you know what Islam teaches you should do with men women don't want? They should be a sacrifice for Islam, and spill their blood for "Palestine".
Oh, there's no shortage of "former" feminists looking for a naive mark.
Those marriages won't last past whenever the time/earnings curve peaks, but society will gaslight those men into thinking they did something wrong.
No right wingers I will not marry a fucking TERF
Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
The GOP is a shit party with nothing to run on
-
Opposing obvious hiring discrimination (The majority of new hires in 2022 were Ukrainian women!)
-
Immigration (but not as a fucking racial agenda, as a law and order agenda)
-
Anti-war policy
-
Fix gender bias in the schools
-
Rebuilding higher education now that everyone at the top has been exposed as a Nazi wannabe.
There, I gave them a platform that would win.
First of all...have more children than you can afford?
The party of fiscal responsibility, sacrificing their main principle of the altar of gynocentrism in the hope of finding naive kids to wife up the TERF rats that have crawled out of the feminist sewer to join us.
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here. I had a lot more typed but Rule 16...
Because Ukrainian men who didn't support the war were dragged off the streets for the regime. The majority of Pallies support the attack.
I'm sure your side are going to spam the false reports as usual.
What value would standing with Pallies have to my anti-feminist cause? It would just validate the comparisons to Nazis, glorifying rape and the rest.
I addressed this already.
I have no intention to do the dirty work of my enemy for them.
Can't think of a funny name for them. They're far from the only opposition group I insult. You should know, stormfag. There's also tradcucks, don't forget that one.
I still don't like him. I just found it interesting that he was allowed to speak when he crapped out women's agenda, but not now.
I mean...we did see the tapes of them bragging about it. I did at least.
What value would standing with Pallies have to my anti-feminist cause? It would just validate the comparisons to Nazis, glorifying rape and the rest.
Not my favorite government. I have criticized them before.
Oh, you are not seriously going to pretend that Pallie trash are the victims like women do.
You can talk about her and the Maidan Revolution, but that's not extremely relevant here. The deals to join NATO were the red line that started the war.
Why would I do that when you can see very clearly that women's side is so pro-Pallie they threw the MeToo cult in the trash to deny Hamas rapists?
Because this war, as you may recall, was started by a terrorist attack.
Ukraine's war was started by a secret agreement with Poland and Lithuania to push for EU and NATO membership for Ukraine, called the Lublin Triangle.
Lithuania, at the time, had a female leader of every political party.
There's also that women were the CEOs of all US defense contractors at the time, the person who pushed to equalize the draft before was mysteriously found dead, Zelensky's wife was a scriptwriter, Von Der Leyen was sending money to Ukraine before the war even started, Carrie Symonds is heavily rumored to have influenced the lack of a peace deal...
I could still keep going.
I would never.
(I'm fishing for sources, actually. It's a nice statistic, but I need the origin)
Traditional roles are a waste of space. The best chefs are men. The best cleaners are expensive AI-powered appliances like a Roomba. The best people to raise kids are men.
There's no going back. AI only makes their roles less useful.
Exactly. Hamas is not above faking being hostages.
The way I write would be too recognizable.
You're right.
The MRA movement got taken over by obvious plants.