-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +3 / -8

We don't need to divide ourselves.

Why would straight white men fight a war on behalf of a government that has actively demonized them for over a decade?

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Because they make bank selling dead fetuses to Big Pharma.

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +9 / -8

use medical kits on everyone — including the people you are trying to beat in the game.

This is called teaming and you will get banned.

It's time for everyone to post their "Imp is right" frustrations. ICRC appointed a female chair in October.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +5 / -7

This is the real reason Biden kept trans people in the military. You will die for women's profits and they will be happy.

-16
TheImpossible1 -16 points ago +8 / -24

Now do people believe me that TERF sympathizers are feminist plants?

"No, you can't ever be happy about the misfortune of your superiors!"

Fuck off, keep fucking off and most importantly - Draft US Women to Save Taiwan!

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +1 / -7

So why is nobody pushing this view? I fully support it. That's what I'd like the GOP to stand for.

7
TheImpossible1 7 points ago +14 / -7

I wouldn't go. Fighting China isn't something I care about, Taiwan is a shithole feminist country that can't get any worse.

At risk of a Rule 2 here, but the idea of a hostile pro-woman government bringing the draft back reminds me of the Gulag Archipelago.

What would things have been like if every security operative, when (s)he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether (s)he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his/her family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +5 / -16

But Walsh is right, his followers cry. Even if he were, it wouldn’t justify his tactics.

Correct. Nothing justifies validating TERF concerns in a society that already coddles women heavily.

Matt Walsh is an accessory to feminism, whether he likes it or not.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +1 / -7

Why most and not all? It's a strange distinction. I don't agree either way, I think they can piss money away as much as they want as long as hiring is meritocratic, as they'll still fail.

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +11 / -10

Nobody would dare stand against women's "right" to invade the spaces of others while locking theirs down like Fort Knox.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

So, exactly like women react?

Men work? That's bad because "patriarchy"

Men don't work? That's bad because "lazy"

Men in prestige jobs? That's just because "they're privileged"

Men in shitty jobs? "No ambition"

Men do male-dominated jobs? "We need more women in that field"

Men do woman-dominated jobs? "We don't want groomer males in teaching"

Men provide? "I deserve alimony for sacrificing my career"

Men don't provide? "The guy's a deadbeat"

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +6 / -9

I wouldn't say being a waitress or one of those really low-tier jobs is an achievement, and that's where they'd end up.

The majority of affirmative action beneficiaries are white women.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

The data lined up at the time. The rate of complications after each booster up to three did seem to show a pattern that would lead to 90% by ten if it continued at the current rate.

You mean like the girls who were raped in Ukraine...that never existed?

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

We'll never know because that figure was based on the idea that they would take two shots and eight boosters by the age of 30. I doubt anyone will.

Yes, yes, of course. We have to believe women, they always tell the truth.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +9 / -9

As I said, a women's museum should be filled with quotes of how women believe men should be treated. Then they should take school kids there to learn from an early age.

No...it's more complicated than that and I don't know how to draw a chart on here.

Let's assume that a company has four levels of employees.

Staff > Managers > Directors > CEO

Because of the aforementioned biases, women mostly end up in the middle two levels, despite not being deserving of those roles. Companies can also promote women to the top level, typically after a woman-led rape scandal that's as fake as women's loyalty.

In a meritocracy, women would fall down the ranks and nearly entirely occupy the lowest level.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

We'll never know if it wasn't true because young men largely rejected the vax.

I take your ridiculous assumption and raise you single mothers who groom their sons to be the perfect simp to bailout a woman like them.

I think it's quite a good argument. #BelieveWomen is bullshit and smears to force me into believing them don't work either.

No, just an ideology filled with actual pedophiles, not something from Nazi war propaganda. You're so much better for that, of course. You should be friends with the stormfags, they believe that bullshit too.

4
TheImpossible1 4 points ago +12 / -8

The difference between personal achievements and the kind that go in a museum is huge. The only reason to have a museum of women is to put all their nasty genocidal quotes up to show everyone who they are.

Well, we know they deliberately handicap the achievements of boys from a young age, because a study confirmed it. We know they have an in-group bias, because every study to deny it ended up confirming it. We know they are handed positions of power for ESG points, because I have the paperwork for it. I wouldn't say that they can say they earned their jobs considering these factors.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

But you were stupid enough to believe in a 90% vaccine death rate, precisely because you are brain dead.

For young men. I actually went back to see what I wrote. I never said 90% of the population, I said 90% of a specifically targeted group.

And no, the intent is to make women admit it's poison, not harm kids. It's just that putting something they actually value in the way might actually make them give a shit.

The phony male doesn't like it much when confronted with "his" real support for pedophilia when accusing others of pedophilia, eh?

You're pathetic. It's like saying you support rape if you don't believe every random college whore's accusations.

When you're done supporting and shilling for pedophiles, tell me.

Works for you too, idiot. TERFism, like all feminist ideologies, is inherently pedophilic.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

You realize that by claiming saying little girls should be vaccinated first is killing them, you prove my point that it is a weapon developed by women to use against us? Remember when the NYT said "what women want is men to get vaccinated"?

When you're done being as petulant as the TERFs you defend, let me know. You've spent so much time allied with them that you're starting to act like one.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +1 / -14

All these smears just because I attacked your precious TERFs.

You're so unhinged. You need to take a break from this shit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›