I mean the kind of people who post stories with no source whatsoever, even when you could have just pulled the link from the page you screenshotted and posted it along with the image. It's rampant.
Are you angry because you feel stupid for not understanding the reference? You don't have to, because that comment wasn't directed at you. In fact, nobody would have ever made any connection if you hadn't said anything. My link is in reference to OP getting baited by a troll post, and a nearly immediate follow-up admitting to it being a troll post, made over a week ago. The joke here is that OP thinks they're in any position to laugh about integrity.
I've been to a handful of Waffle Houses over the years. A couple times for breakfast in the morning, but mostly to wind down after a night of drinking. There haven't ever been any outbursts during any of my trips. These were also exclusively locations in rural areas, which may be the difference. My experience is mediocre food cooked by people who were most likely on controlled substances.
Your source is 4chan? Seriously? For fuck sake, the link to the story was in the post. Why do I have to do the work for you people?
I hate people speaking on things they know nothing about as a whole. That includes using words they don't know the meaning of. It isn't a metaphor, despite that excuse being thrown around since doubling down is apparently less humiliating than admitting fault. It's a misused buzzword that became overused because terminally online "rightists" thought it sounded cool and edgy. If I'm going to have to be part of the Right, I expect them to do, and be, better.
That isn't what that word means. A look at any reputable dictionary, digital or physical, published at any point in history, will tell you that. The word you're looking for is "cowardice". That' will save you future embarrassment.
I didn't see anything indicating those running the event had unfaithful spouses. Link?
You look at his posts and think that he's worth paying attention to, much less dedicating an entire post to addressing? Imp is an unhinged incel. He sounds an awful lot like what I imagine these Stormfront people sound like. The only difference is the demographic he's speaking of. Said demographic wants nothing to do with him. I've never seen someone who speaks the way he does about women ever have any romantic relationship with one.
I got halfway through the video, which is inexplicably posted four times on the page you linked, and I didn't see or hear any credible evidence to support the claim the WEF is pushing pedophilia. Say what you will about me not watching the last half, but proof is something you need to lead with if you're going to make a claim like that. There was also a lack of anything in the text on that page which could lend credibility to the accusation. All I saw were opinion pieces published by news outlets of questionable integrity.
Nobody here worth listening to would call you a "cuck", because nobody here knows enough to comment on the fidelity of your wife. That's if they even know whether or not you're married in the first place. I don't put much stock in the opinions of people who throw words around they don't know the meaning of.
My personal opinion, and I say "opinion" because I'm not ready to say this objectively, is that anyone who needs to create a social server centered around themselves is regressive enough. Development and support of a mod doesn't require 24/7 access to a social club. It doesn't require a moderation team. People who attempt to cultivate Discord communities tend to lean left. I don't want you to tell me the names, but can you think of any server with a significant number of users run by people that could be categorized as "well-adjusted?" How many of those exist compared to the multitude created, and moderated, by the mentally and emotionally unstable? Lastly, have you ever seen anyone in the vicinity of being well-adjusted ever use the terms "transphobic" or "ableist"? The rest of the rules make sense, but those are what I consider a "regressive tripwire".
On an unrelated note, in relation to your semi-unrelated note: I think most people here steer clear of EGS. They're not too keen on downloading spyware controlled by hostile foreign states.
I've looked, but I can't find any indication the wife of Andrés Manuel López Obrador is cheating on him. Do you have any sources for that?
Metal Gear Solid 4 is one of my favorite movies.
Not just "people". The person who made the original post went on to admit it was a troll post..
A twitter post made by someone with zero involvement in the show, and who clarified it was a joke less than two hours after the original post.
I'm getting that impression. I don't like how things turned out for that IP, but I never once got the impression he was a sexual predator. He was a man who loved his daughter, and Ellie was a shot at redemption.
That is certainly the wildest, and most intentionally obtuse, take on the first game that I have seen since its release. I don't want to have to defend the team involved in making The Last of Us, but you should reevaluate how you're getting your information.
The source is a post on Twitter made by someone with no connection to the show. There was even a follow-up post clarifying it was a joke.
I'm seeing plenty of indication that Harry cheated on Meghan, but nothing solid showing the reverse was true. You have a source for that?
There was mention that California reopened a law that allows them to sue, meaning that law was open at least one other time in the past five decades. It didn't have to be in 1978. My point is they had the option to sue, or at least raise some concerns about what happened, and they didn't until their retirement money started running out.
I always appreciate those who out themselves early on. Too many people, and companies, keep their regressive beliefs to themselves and only pull out the rug after they've generated revenue.
If it wasn't an issue for them in 1968, or in 1978, then it certainly isn't an issue for them now. You don't get to wait over 54 years to decide something is finally a problem for you.
I saw the Twitter thread on Monday, and I thought it was an interesting and informative read. Now I feel a little selfish for not sharing. He's got some other interesting pieces if you care to debase yourself enough to use Twitter. As someone who used to work for a beverage company, I don't believe people should be drinking the stuff in anywhere near the quantity they do. The soda Pepsi and Coca Cola produce and distribute is corrosive. A spill of any significant portion will cause nausea. Does that sound safe? Sugar is just the easily approachable subject. The difference in weight between a pallet of regular soda, and the sugar-free diet variant, is unnerving.
It should also be said that both companies deserve to take a massive loss for their "diversity and inclusion" garbage and the sheer number redundant office staff. I don't see any meaningful positive impact either has made. Interestingly enough, I hear some trimming of bureaucratic fat is being done. I'm guessing people saw how well Twitter still manages to run despite how many people Elon sacked after the takeover.
Seek help.