1
RaggetySpam 1 point ago +1 / -0

There really is no limit to how restrictive things could get once the framework is available. Should blasphemy laws be a thing? Does it end at restriction? How about compelled speech? You seem to be saying that you don't mind certain speech being an acceptable point for violence to be done against the sayer. So why not legislate to outlaw some speech, for the common good and peace?

1
RaggetySpam 1 point ago +1 / -0

The line for what is acceptable can shift. You're on the safe side by default for now. Once they decide to move it you may not be and allowing constitutional freedoms to be eroded is an easy way to become a slave.