If you're successful why are you here? The world is great since you have succeeded and you don't care to help those that haven't succeeded given your attitude so again I ask you, why are you here? You are successful so go and enjoy your success. What you have is what a great life looks like so go and enjoy it. Don't waste your great life arguing with losers on the internet. Congratulations, you won! Here's your medal! Now go out and enjoy life. Get off your computer. Never complain about a problem again, you don't need to. Everything is wonderful, you are successful! Enjoy life! This is the best world that has existed in the best period of time and you made it! Bask in this knowledge! Get out and seize the moment!

If you're successful why are you here? Go and enjoy your success.

That's what you think and I haven't said that exactly.

The system is broken in a lot of ways. You think I like the way we're promoting dysgenics in society or egalitarianism among the slave caste in order to try to remove natural hierarchies within this caste in order to ensure the slave caste can't improve such that they could overthrow the masters with new ones?

Our society is immensely oppressive and warped with all sorts of wrong value systems. Most of what everyone is taught is nothing but lies designed to perpetuate the system.

I don't agree with any of it but I also don't agree with your value system.

Yeah, the White women in this society aren't "my own people". They've made that clear.

I won't ever have a war bride and you'll never get your WN society. This is all fantasy for both of us.

I don't consider most of the White men in this society "my people" either since 80% of them support this system. Since they support the system which doesn't benefit me they are my enemy regardless of their race. The Jews have a name for good goys. Shabbos Goys. You think I see these Shabbos Goys as my friend? Absolutely not. System lovers are no friend of mine.

You seem to make the mistake that just because a person is White they must be good yet you don't believe I'm good and I'm probably more White than you. Therefore, there's more to things than just race. Sleeping with the wife of my enemy is not dishonorable as far as I'm concerned. Don't want me to sleep with your wife then don't be my enemy and help me bring down this system.

Why wouldn't I be nationalist when all the other powerful men in this nation had the same goals as me? When the Romans or Greeks conquered other lands or the Mongolians or whomever, you don't think they weren't "nationalist"? I would never sellout my own people to my enemies like a jew for some more shekels or even some nice slave girls. I have too much honor for that. But if some farmers started suggesting I was being mean to women because I took some war brides at the last conquest, I might have a problem with them regardless of their race.

Not all WN societies need to be National Socialism. That's an incorrect basis. The only requisite of WN is mostly only White people in the society but even that can differ. Is it still WN if you have non-White slaves? America prior to the Civil War could have been considered WN.

I don't want a WN society with White men like you if you're running things and you don't want one with me if I'm running things so here we are. Turns out race isn't the only requisite. Oups. Or perhaps White people are far more diverse than one would have you believe... Perhaps the subraces matter. Remember, even among White you have deviations in quality about a mean. Why would I want a democracy with all Whites anymore than a democracy now? You still end up with a mediocre outcome.

I think truthfully, there are different types of people. You ever hear the slave, merchant, warrior type division of castes of people? There are countless different ways to divide people and label them. WN on its own needs more than WN because there's significant differences in how to run a WN society. Sans-jew is the bare minimum and nothing but a first step. There's still significant more work for any WN community to go in formulating a good society. Hitler's NatSocs would not have turned out good at all. The socialism, the overly focused on family/women and welfare would have led to a dysgenic situation. I bet you if the NatSocs were around today, they'd be a lot more like modern leftists/liberals than you realize.

Yes, the ideal society is getting the Jews out of the aristocracy and putting good White men back in, like myself. You and your NatSocs can continue to be good goys for my new aristocracy after the change of elite. I promise you'll be treated way better than now but your lifestyle of breeding for your Goddess in your homestead isn't my lifestyle.

I care about my brothers but my brothers aren't of the slave-caste. If you don't understand what I mean then you probably won't get it. I would implement an aristocracy in any society I was a part of. I would be part of the nobility and you would be part of the peasantry. You wish for equality. I do not. You have slavish moral values I have no care for.

You've got it. Anyone with half a brain can see our society unfairly oppresses men while it unjustly elevates women. Men are getting a bad deal in society and women are getting a better deal than they deserve. I'm just trying to leverage immigrants raping women as a way to bring the scales back in balance. That is all.

You ever hear this Hitler speech?

The catchword “Women’s Liberation” is merely a phrase invented by the Jewish intellect, and its contents are marked by the same spirit. The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life. She possessed what Nature gave her automatically as an asset to maintain and preserve; just as the man, in such an age, never had to fear that he would be ousted from his position in respect to woman. Woman has been the last to contest man’s right to his position. Only when he was no longer sure of himself in recognizing his duty did the immortal instinct of survival and preservation begin to revolt in woman. After this revolt, a shift took place which was not in accordance with Nature’s design, and it prevailed until both sexes returned to what an eternally wise Providence assigned to them. If it is said that a man’s world is the State, that the man’s world is his struggle, his willingness to devote himself to the community, one might perhaps say that a woman’s world is a smaller one. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But where would the larger world be if no one wanted to care for the small world? How could the larger world survive if there was no one who would make the cares of the smaller world the content of his life? No, the large world is built upon this small world! This greater world cannot survive if the small world is not firm. Providence assigned to woman the care of this, her very own world, and it is only on this foundation that the man’s world can be formed and can grow. However, these two worlds are never opposed to one another. They mutually complement each other, they belong together, just as man and wife belong together. We do not feel that it is right when a woman forces her way into a man’s world, in territory belonging to him; instead, we feel it is natural when both of these worlds remain divorced from one another. One of the worlds is home to the power of feelings, the power of the soul! The other is home to the power of recognition, the power of toughness, of resolution, and of fighting morale! In one case, this power requires the full willingness of the woman to devote her life to maintaining and multiplying this important cell, and in the other case it requires the willingness of the man to safeguard life. What a man sacrifices in struggling for his Volk, a woman sacrifices in struggling to preserve this Volk in individual cases. What a man gives in heroic courage on the battlefield, woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child to which she gives birth is a battle which she wages in her Volk’s fateful question of to be or not to be. And hence both must mutually value and respect each other by recognizing that each part is accomplishing the task assigned to it by Nature and Providence. The performance of these two tasks will necessarily result in mutual respect. What the Jewish intellect maintains is not true-that respect is determined by the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the two sexes-but rather this respect requires that neither of the sexes endeavors to do what belongs to the other. This respect ultimately lies in the knowledge of each half that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole! Therefore, woman throughout the ages has always been the helpmate of man and thus his most loyal friend, and man, too, has been the protector of his wife throughout the ages and thus her best friend. And both perceived in this manner of living the common foundation for the existence of what they loved, and of its continued subsistence in the future. Woman is an egoist in maintaining her small world, putting man in a position to preserve the greater world, and man is an egoist in maintaining this greater world, for the one is indissolubly bound up with the other. We will stand up against an intellectualism of the most depraved sort which would tear asunder what God hath joined.

See, Hitler has a very nice way of saying women should learn their place and get back in the kitchen. Why? Because he felt he needed to win women over and this played well at the time. Women loved Hitler.

I would have never have framed it this way. I would have said women need to learn their place as possessions of men and get back in the kitchen if that is where their owners determine they should be.

He is

They aren't feminists. I'm not a feminist. You are a feminist. So you're right. Still, I have not much in common with neither you or them.

I drink water therefore I'm like all humans. You can find comparisons in anything but the fact of the matter is I am a representative of their opposite.

The only reason you can't see that is because you are more like them than you are like me. You have minor differences with the aforementioned people. You're arguing about different color packaging. I want to change the very foundational values.

I did consider that and if that were true then the jews, biden, the NWO, feminists, Lucifer, communists and everything most people on here generally consider to be "bad" would actually be good. In fact, if I was not a great man then the world right now in the way that it is would be a utopia. So ask yourself this question. If you think I'm not a great man why do you have any problem with society the way it is? You should love life. Stop visiting these forums. Enjoy life. You're living in the best period of time ever in the history of mankind. Most people are great people and the only bad men are the few guys stuck on forums like these.

Truly, if you don't think I'm a good man then you really need to ask yourself what's wrong with the status quo. What's wrong with the system. What's wrong with life the way it is now? You need to ask these things because I am the literal antithesis to the world and system in place now and this status quo. If you dislike the way this world is then I am a great man but if you like the world the way it is then I am a bad man.

Of course I consider myself a great man.

If women don't think so, then perhaps they need to be raped by immigrants until they change their mind.

What kind of hentai fantasy shit is this? Obviously, I wouldn't want to fuck my sister but if my sister was a 30yo wine, cat lady who spent her 20s running an onlyfans account profiting off lonely simps while getting fuck-and-chucked by assholes at the club who now whines and complains about being unable to find her dream man while reading Twilight and 50 Shades of Grey and masturbating with her vibrator every day after turning down every good man who asks her out because he's not good enough for her such that she's now complaining about immigrants potentially raping her, I would tell her to take a good look in the mirror. If women want men in their society to protect them then these women need to start pulling up their bootstraps and treating the men in their society in a manner in which the men will feel compelled to want to help them.

I'm willing to find middle ground but ultimately, either they give me their pussy or I don't care about who gets their pussy. Yes.

Of course. I don't agree with the contractual terms setout in modernity to obtain one. So, the non-White men can rape all the women they want until the women are willing to change those terms such that they are in my favor.

If I don't possess any women myself why would I care what happens to women? Not my problem. I would only care if I owned my own woman.

Economics is such a tricky subject to approach from an introduction perspective because of how complex and controversial it is...

You're better off talking to a middle schooler about it than books.

You're correct. How they want to be treated is usually something akin to like 50 Shades or Twilight. Basically, women mad some rich successful hot guy isn't romancing them.

Yeah, this is ConPro... Wait, I'm in KIA2? huh.... I suppose it's pretty anti-jew here but I dunno if it's that much.

KiA2 in a nutshell: GIVE ME BIG ANIME BOOBIES. GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE TO DESERVE THIS GAMERGATE HELLHOLE. GIVE ME BOOBIES I WANT BIG ANIME BOOBIES PLEASE GOD PLEASE. THE CURVES ARE ALL I EVER WANTED. NICE FEMININE CURVES. I SWEAR I HAVE NOT SINNED TOO BADLY GOD PLEASE DONT ABANDON ME GIVE ME BIG ANIME GOTH TITTIES PLEASE

Yeah, I would say there's something else going on. I probably write 1 new $5m deal a month on average with the occasional $15-30m deal here or there. Most projects I lend to are ~10 units but I've done up to 100. The 100 unit one I did, ALL, and I do mean ALL of them were presold to regular people. The developer actually refused to sell to investors/companies and wanted people who wanted to live there as their main home buy because it was also where the developer was going to live and house his mother too. That's a one-off unique situation but still, I see new developments all the time and most people buying are not investors or companies. Companies typically buy the whole building and usually do the development themselves. Investors do buy from time-to-time, sometimes in hot markets and don't even intend to buy the house, they're just looking to flip the presale...

Anyway, I think your specific situation has some unique reasons for why it happened to be that way but it's not normally only investors buying. Still, a lot of people buying houses are buying a second home or a rental too as you can see from the numbers above so it happens but it's not usually any sort of sophisticated super-rich scheme. A lot of people buying rental properties are just people like your mom or dad deciding to buy a second property for their retirement. They aren't super rich by any stretch.

I think your situation regarding "can't wait" is unique also. Lots of people are in 12-month leases and can often negotiate month-to-month... so if they pre-buy a property, they don't need to worry about rent going up because they're in a lease. By the time the lease is up their house is ready or maybe they go month-to-month a few months or have to break a little early.

I think you're looking at this a little too "investor-like" yourself. Lots of people buying these new developments want the house in that area and want something new. They'd rather pay a little more in rent for a year to wait for their dream-home rather than buy something they don't really want because they care to save some money in rent.

Also, a lot of the people buying these presales are upgrading homes. They bought something cheap before and are looking to buy their forever home. They can wait for their forever home as long as it's exactly what they want.