The catchword “Women’s Liberation” is merely a phrase invented by the Jewish intellect, and its contents are marked by the same spirit. The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life. She possessed what Nature gave her automatically as an asset to maintain and preserve; just as the man, in such an age, never had to fear that he would be ousted from his position in respect to woman.
Woman has been the last to contest man’s right to his position. Only when he was no longer sure of himself in recognizing his duty did the immortal instinct of survival and preservation begin to revolt in woman. After this revolt, a shift took place which was not in accordance with Nature’s design, and it prevailed until both sexes returned to what an eternally wise Providence assigned to them.
If it is said that a man’s world is the State, that the man’s world is his struggle, his willingness to devote himself to the community, one might perhaps say that a woman’s world is a smaller one. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But where would the larger world be if no one wanted to care for the small world? How could the larger world survive if there was no one who would make the cares of the smaller world the content of his life? No, the large world is built upon this small world! This greater world cannot survive if the small world is not firm. Providence assigned to woman the care of this, her very own world, and it is only on this foundation that the man’s world can be formed and can grow.
However, these two worlds are never opposed to one another. They mutually complement each other, they belong together, just as man and wife belong together.
We do not feel that it is right when a woman forces her way into a man’s world, in territory belonging to him; instead, we feel it is natural when both of these worlds remain divorced from one another. One of the worlds is home to the power of feelings, the power of the soul! The other is home to the power of recognition, the power of toughness, of resolution, and of fighting morale! In one case, this power requires the full willingness of the woman to devote her life to maintaining and multiplying this important cell, and in the other case it requires the willingness of the man to safeguard life.
What a man sacrifices in struggling for his Volk, a woman sacrifices in struggling to preserve this Volk in individual cases. What a man gives in heroic courage on the battlefield, woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child to which she gives birth is a battle which she wages in her Volk’s fateful question of to be or not to be.
And hence both must mutually value and respect each other by recognizing that each part is accomplishing the task assigned to it by Nature and Providence. The performance of these two tasks will necessarily result in mutual respect.
What the Jewish intellect maintains is not true-that respect is determined by the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the two sexes-but rather this respect requires that neither of the sexes endeavors to do what belongs to the other. This respect ultimately lies in the knowledge of each half that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole! Therefore, woman throughout the ages has always been the helpmate of man and thus his most loyal friend, and man, too, has been the protector of his wife throughout the ages and thus her best friend. And both perceived in this manner of living the common foundation for the existence of what they loved, and of its continued subsistence in the future. Woman is an egoist in maintaining her small world, putting man in a position to preserve the greater world, and man is an egoist in maintaining this greater world, for the one is indissolubly bound up with the other. We will stand up against an intellectualism of the most depraved sort which would tear asunder what God hath joined.
See, Hitler has a very nice way of saying women should learn their place and get back in the kitchen. Why? Because he felt he needed to win women over and this played well at the time. Women loved Hitler.
I would have never have framed it this way. I would have said women need to learn their place as possessions of men and get back in the kitchen if that is where their owners determine they should be.
I care about my brothers but my brothers aren't of the slave-caste. If you don't understand what I mean then you probably won't get it. I would implement an aristocracy in any society I was a part of. I would be part of the nobility and you would be part of the peasantry. You wish for equality. I do not. You have slavish moral values I have no care for.
They aren't feminists. I'm not a feminist. You are a feminist. So you're right. Still, I have not much in common with neither you or them.
Hitler would be a feminist by your definition.
You ever hear this Hitler speech?
See, Hitler has a very nice way of saying women should learn their place and get back in the kitchen. Why? Because he felt he needed to win women over and this played well at the time. Women loved Hitler.
I would have never have framed it this way. I would have said women need to learn their place as possessions of men and get back in the kitchen if that is where their owners determine they should be.
I've read that speech but don't think I've heard the audio.
Yes, I know. You don't care about your Volk, your nation. You only care about having a slave for your own personal pleasure.
I care about my brothers but my brothers aren't of the slave-caste. If you don't understand what I mean then you probably won't get it. I would implement an aristocracy in any society I was a part of. I would be part of the nobility and you would be part of the peasantry. You wish for equality. I do not. You have slavish moral values I have no care for.
He is