I'm really happy with how this is turning out. The "don't be a fag" clause will require a lot of good faith on the part of the mods (anyone who remembers the dickwolf nonsense from half KIA can attest to that)

That's a good point as well. I just retooled it to be more specific and moderate (although I think "don't be a psycho" would cover 90% of the moronic posts here).

I do want to keep the "community standard" in there to prevent rules lawyering, though.

My only suggestion is more clarity on where the line in drawn for the new rule 1. Ableist's latest post illustrates the problem. I like the approach u/BandageBandolier took and I'm obviously an advocate of it being as narrow as possible, but regardless of where the line is drawn I think it should be clear to everyone. I think u/Kienan brought up the idea of short and long form rules, and the latter could be used to clarify things without making the former too verbose.

Yeah I'll be honest, I don't really know where I stand on Ableist's post. Lol.

I'm really happy with how this is turning out. The "don't be a fag" clause will require a lot of good faith on the part of the mods (anyone who remembers the dickwolf nonsense from half KIA can attest to that)

That's a good point as well. I just retooled it to be more specific and moderate (although I think "don't be a psycho" would cover 90% of the moronic posts here).

I do want to keep the "community standard" in there to prevent rules lawyering, though.