So you'd prefer for them to be treated like superiors?
I support them being treated in the way consonant with their biology, and the same for men.
I say we use the equality argument against them at all opportunities.
Agreed, but never acknowledging that there is anything legitimate about it, and only to undermine their nonsense. This particular one is not very good though.
No abortion until men can relinquish fatherhood with no penalty.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Women are in a position to 'relinquish' motherhood, men are not. Again, biology.
Women are in a position to 'relinquish' motherhood, men are not. Again, biology.
Not even biology. After birth, a woman can give away her child for adoption or to the state and choose to be free of the “burden” forever, but if she wants to keep it, the biological father has to help for 18 years.
I support them being treated in the way consonant with their biology, and the same for men.
Agreed, but never acknowledging that there is anything legitimate about it, and only to undermine their nonsense. This particular one is not very good though.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Women are in a position to 'relinquish' motherhood, men are not. Again, biology.
Not even biology. After birth, a woman can give away her child for adoption or to the state and choose to be free of the “burden” forever, but if she wants to keep it, the biological father has to help for 18 years.
It's not about what is useful to you, but what is good for society.
...because of their biology.
You explain to me instead why you want to use the state in a futile quest to try to negate biology.