Isn't it? They have way more options for birth control, they should absolutely be left with the responsibility. Biological arguments are outdated and advances in birth control for women negate the entire argument that men should be forced to comply.
You explain to me how it's fair that a group with about 10 different ways to avoid having a child should be protected from the consequences while a group with only one actual method, with a higher potential failure rate than theirs, should be left holding the bag?
Well, that's not very useful is it?
Isn't it? They have way more options for birth control, they should absolutely be left with the responsibility. Biological arguments are outdated and advances in birth control for women negate the entire argument that men should be forced to comply.
You explain to me how it's fair that a group with about 10 different ways to avoid having a child should be protected from the consequences while a group with only one actual method, with a higher potential failure rate than theirs, should be left holding the bag?
It's not about what is useful to you, but what is good for society.
...because of their biology.
You explain to me instead why you want to use the state in a futile quest to try to negate biology.
It makes sense for the state to take the side of the party with less options.