So you'd prefer for them to be treated like superiors?
I support them being treated in the way consonant with their biology, and the same for men.
I say we use the equality argument against them at all opportunities.
Agreed, but never acknowledging that there is anything legitimate about it, and only to undermine their nonsense. This particular one is not very good though.
No abortion until men can relinquish fatherhood with no penalty.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Women are in a position to 'relinquish' motherhood, men are not. Again, biology.
No abortion until men can relinquish fatherhood with no penalty.
This! Now that is true equality!
At the very least? The male pays the cost of the abortion (through his medical insurance!) and that is the end of his responsibilities! Even if she 'chooses' to keep the baby? His role has ended.
Methinks you have stumbled upon the argument least likely to convince anyone.
There's little point discussing moral principles with those who have none.
I honestly hope that any argument predicated on the idiotic fiction that men and women are equal would be laughed out of court even here.
I support them being treated in the way consonant with their biology, and the same for men.
Agreed, but never acknowledging that there is anything legitimate about it, and only to undermine their nonsense. This particular one is not very good though.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Women are in a position to 'relinquish' motherhood, men are not. Again, biology.
This! Now that is true equality!
At the very least? The male pays the cost of the abortion (through his medical insurance!) and that is the end of his responsibilities! Even if she 'chooses' to keep the baby? His role has ended.