Because in this day and age, if a guy ever hits a girl, everyone will take her side. The students, the school, the cops, the courts. Doesn't matter if she was the one who provoked it and was assaulting him, and that it was recorded. Everyone will take her side, especially once the crocodile tears start pouring.
That goes back GENERATIONS, even back to the Greatest Generation. Actually look at old entertainment, it sure as fuck didn't glorify woman-beating, and guys who did it - or even threatened it - were meant to be seen as either cads or buffoons. "Boys oughtn't hit girls" is heavy in stuff aimed at kids, though. Charles Schultz showed little girls hitting boys, precisely because it was the inverse of this trope, and seen as harmless and almost silly, as if Lucy couldn't really harm Charlie Brown (a prejudice he seemed to have kept his entire life). And women were free to face-slap men if they got "fresh" or forward .... and the man was assumed to have deserved it, if a women went so far as to BITCH-SLAP them.
This guy doesn't even want to hit her though. She's spitting in his face and he's just passively accepting it and spouting canards like "I don't hit girls". He doesn't even really seem angry. Something is wrong with this kid, and many others.
Even getting angry runs the risk of reports. No reaction is all you can do.
Source : Was sent to HR once for being "overly anti-social" by cutting short every conversation with female co-workers. I just told them that I care more about getting my job done than making friends. Got a report made against me after it kept happening, so I left. This was at peak MeToo, when everyone silently despised their existence.
One good thing about social distancing, working from home etc. is that women finally have no power over us. We don't have to be near them or talk to them at work anymore.
Everything you do is micro-analysed to see if they can get any angle to attack you using their systems of control.
Because in this day and age, if a guy ever hits a girl, everyone will take her side. The students, the school, the cops, the courts. Doesn't matter if she was the one who provoked it and was assaulting him, and that it was recorded. Everyone will take her side, especially once the crocodile tears start pouring.
That goes back GENERATIONS, even back to the Greatest Generation. Actually look at old entertainment, it sure as fuck didn't glorify woman-beating, and guys who did it - or even threatened it - were meant to be seen as either cads or buffoons. "Boys oughtn't hit girls" is heavy in stuff aimed at kids, though. Charles Schultz showed little girls hitting boys, precisely because it was the inverse of this trope, and seen as harmless and almost silly, as if Lucy couldn't really harm Charlie Brown (a prejudice he seemed to have kept his entire life). And women were free to face-slap men if they got "fresh" or forward .... and the man was assumed to have deserved it, if a women went so far as to BITCH-SLAP them.
This guy doesn't even want to hit her though. She's spitting in his face and he's just passively accepting it and spouting canards like "I don't hit girls". He doesn't even really seem angry. Something is wrong with this kid, and many others.
Even getting angry runs the risk of reports. No reaction is all you can do.
Source : Was sent to HR once for being "overly anti-social" by cutting short every conversation with female co-workers. I just told them that I care more about getting my job done than making friends. Got a report made against me after it kept happening, so I left. This was at peak MeToo, when everyone silently despised their existence.
One good thing about social distancing, working from home etc. is that women finally have no power over us. We don't have to be near them or talk to them at work anymore.
Everything you do is micro-analysed to see if they can get any angle to attack you using their systems of control.
I think you're projecting, unless you meant those specific co-workers.