Comments (70)
sorted by:
BulbasaurusThe7th 54 points ago +54 / -0

And then when this girl is the single mother of some gangbanger's kid she will demand government money and someone to take care of her and baby Tyrone. How swell.

TheImpossible1 10 points ago +18 / -8

No wealth transfer to those who hate us!

If a woman wants a bailout, it should come from the taxes paid by women.

BulbasaurusThe7th 35 points ago +36 / -1

Why should I pay for her shit when I am 100% against it, though? Nobody should.
Trust me, they hate me as well, lol. (Been told I need to get raped ASAP to understand I need feminism. Which is something absolutely impossible to understand.)

AntonioOfVenice [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

(Been told I need to get raped ASAP to understand I need feminism. Which is something absolutely impossible to understand.)

It's actually fairly easy to understand. They believe nothing that they say, which is why you never heard them about Rotherham or Cologne, only about things that they made up. Someone who does not support them has to be brought into line by any means necessary.

The racial-identitarian and BLTGPOWEKJREW lobbies work the same way.

StoicVampirePig 13 points ago +13 / -0

'Been told I need to get raped ASAP to understand I need feminism'

These people are ill...have you seen them btw? Like anyone would even...

AbleistSL 4 points ago +4 / -0

They pretty much stated that they hoped women who don't share their views get raped so that they would adopt sexist views towards men.

TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +8 / -12

Well, the same reason the current system has men paying for all kinds of useless crap for women. Because somebody has to.

It makes more sense for the sisterhood to help them out than for men who they openly call for the mass murder of.

BulbasaurusThe7th 20 points ago +22 / -2

Sisterhood what? I am not their sister, mate.

onetruephilosoraptor 11 points ago +13 / -2

I don't think you or anyone should pay for this girl's future gangbanger child.

We can only disincentivize the rampant growth of young single mothers by making sure that there are severe consequences for being one.

TheImpossible1 1 point ago +5 / -4

Except those women who oppose paying for it themselves will label you "misogynistic" for daring to cross that line.

onetruephilosoraptor 16 points ago +17 / -1

We need to disincentivize single motherhood.

Fuck the optics.

The problem is getting someone with the balls to get it done actually elected, in power and to keep him alive long enough to pull it off.

... continue reading thread?
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +6 / -7

Well I'm certainly not, but I'm still paying, despite being told by them that I'm subhuman and worthy of nothing more than torture followed by a slow, painful death.

AntonioOfVenice [S] 8 points ago +14 / -6

Don't you get tired of your self-pity? You sound like a woman hooked on feminism.

TheImpossible1 3 points ago +5 / -2

What do you mean?

christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Taxation is theft. This is what happens when you let guilt tripping control you.

Knife-TotingRat 5 points ago +10 / -5

Fully backed by the "every human foetus is sacred" crowd.

onetruephilosoraptor 24 points ago +24 / -0

I think abortion is undoubtedly murder yet I am disturbed when I see the results of mass single motherhood in western society.

Single motherhood is a problem that only has practical but morally ugly solutions.

DocScrove 22 points ago +22 / -0

A lot of single motherhood in the US is caused by the way we do welfare. If we didn't punish them for having a father living with them and contributing then we wouldn't be where we are with it. It was designed that way to keep people on the doll, or seems to be from the results of it. If you wanted to reduce it, cut out benefits on a 2 for 1 scheme. For every 2 dollars you earn, you lose 1 dollar in benefits, so instead of discouraging work with it, you encourage working.

Throwawaycuzmeh 14 points ago +14 / -0

There’s nothing morally ugly about a socially enforced moral framework that shames people into doing what is right for both themselves and time community.

What did you think religion was? And why would you think the alternative is anything other than tyranny or chaos?

DennJW 10 points ago +10 / -0

Abolish wellfare, and there will be no single mothers.

onetruephilosoraptor 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am all for it.

It is easier said than done.

Alzeron 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd argue part of the problem is weak men. Men too weak to either not stick it in crazy or stick around when their actions create life. A lack of good, strong father figures is a huge contributor to a lot of our modern problems.

ArchVileRespawned 11 points ago +14 / -3

When someone asks you if you are pro-life or pro-choice, the correct response is, "what race is it?"

Decrixxx 35 points ago +36 / -1

Trump win elections in 2016

SJW: nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! he will create an fascistic dictature nnnnooooooooooooo!

what I expeced: everyone will be forced to wear maga hat. those who refute will get fired and beaten.

what I got: everyone is forced to NOT wear the maga hat. those who refute get fired and beaten.

sorry SJW schizos, I'm gonna vote for the least fascist of the bunch.

send_it 33 points ago +33 / -0

get bullied, beaten, fired, publcially shamed etc. for supporting the sitting President.

If that's anti-fascism, I'm choosing fascism.

AntonioOfVenice [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

Look at the monsters that these teachers create.

Did the thief say something like "I'm going to nut in your tea"? Perhaps there is another angle, and this is a girl pretending to be a boy?

TentElephant 23 points ago +23 / -0

American schools don't teach much. What little they do teach is wrong. And, it is the only place where there is an expectation of violence.

I tried to find the exact quote, but it seems to have been forced out of search engines by Trump saying something bad about schools once.

PooperSnooperPrime -5 points ago +3 / -8

Students get their politcs from their parents.

onetruephilosoraptor 27 points ago +28 / -1

The media, the schools and celebrities also have a lot of influence on kids.

PooperSnooperPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are bad apples in school. We regularly see dumbasses being spotlighted in posts here. But it gets pretty old hearing from dumbass armchair slacktivists who aren't willing do anything about it besides bitch on social media. Get involved or the problem will never be solved.

onetruephilosoraptor 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't have kids and will not have kids.

I cannot get involved directly.

Mashiki 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you pay property tax, you can be directly involved. Property taxes go for funding education, and in the US and Canada you have the legal right to be involved. Some states allow you to opt out of that though if you don't have kids.

PooperSnooperPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bullshit. You're a member of the community. A future nursing home patient. You want some militant trannie finding out you posted on an alt right website and giving you the wrong meds on purpose?

Go to the next school board meeting. Read them a passage from Abigail Shriers book and ask "what they are doing to ensure that isn't happening in their district?"

TheImpossible1 15 points ago +19 / -4 (edited)

Oh, look. Our better halves.

President Trump, please introduce gender based hate crime designation for crimes against men by women. There's no need to do it the other way, because

Misogyny is not real

Edit : Spitting is bioterrorism during Covid, throw the book at her.

onetruephilosoraptor 14 points ago +14 / -0

Even when people say that "better halves" drivel sarcastically, I find it so disturbing that there are many simps who truly believe that lie.

Young women who are predominantly leftists have demonstrated clearly these days who is most likely to react with immense anger and sheer hatred in response to merely a dissenting view.

dunmer_say_the_nword 18 points ago +18 / -0

Women act like banshees and get lauded for it. Men act like banshees and get made fun of by their friends or get their ass kicked.

Women will always have an army of simps willing to defend them. A dissenting man is an army of one.

Realize, too, that I applaud the irrational man being made a pariah. It's what SHOULD happen, to everyone.

TheImpossible1 10 points ago +12 / -2

They seem more like our worse halves, in all honesty.

onetruephilosoraptor 12 points ago +13 / -1

I don't like the halves terminology at all because the statement implies that neither is complete without the other.

Women generally need men or a big welfare government to survive.

Men on the other hand can survive minimalistically without women.

Procreation does require both genders but for people like me who don't want to bring a child into this fucked up world, I need a woman like I need a hole in my head.

AntonioOfVenice [S] 6 points ago +8 / -2

Even when people say that "better halves" drivel sarcastically, I find it so disturbing that there are many simps who truly believe that lie.

I believe it was correct before modern women were corrupted by feminism.

onetruephilosoraptor 14 points ago +14 / -0

Feminism heavily worsened the behavior of women but it still only brought out what they were always capable of.

Gender relations were much better in the past but women then were not all perfect or always better than men.

Women always are still human beings which means they always have an chance of being scum just like men can.

I may be MGTOW but I still recognize that both women and men can be capable of committing terrible acts.

AntonioOfVenice [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Feminism heavily worsened the behavior of women but it still only brought out what they were always capable of.

It's no surprise that humans are capable of great evil.

onetruephilosoraptor 15 points ago +15 / -0

Humanity is capable of building and achieving great things and yet many still choose to destroy and commit the worst horrors.

Too many people would rather push globalism, corporate cronyism, divisive racial and gender identity politics, marxism, censorship and mass violence than contribute or build anything of value.

The world I was born into was miles better than what we have now.

What a fucking shameful thing to see and experience.

Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

True, but few quite understood the levels women would stoop to once unfettered. Likely because we took all the social shaming away at once, so they were given almost free reign to become the worst versions of themselves without easing into it.

Like a teenager not properly parented.

MetalGearMk3 14 points ago +14 / -0

What the fuck is that wigger thing

GoggleHead 5 points ago +8 / -3

A right cross would sort this out real quick. This kid needs to stop being so weak.

TheImpossible1 22 points ago +24 / -2

Yeah, then he gets blackballed from every college for hitting a woman and ends up infamous for it. Then every time he applies for a job, the woman in HR shreds his application.

Great fucking idea.

SparkPlasma -7 points ago +7 / -14

This kid isn't some restrained man carefully considering the consequences of his counteraction and opting for non-aggression, he's clearly a submissive loser who would be like this regardless of what the rules say. He doesn't even seem mad, if you're not a bitch in this sort of situation you would be pissed regardless of whether you choose to be violent or not.

TheImpossible1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe he's just resigned to the fact that if he does anything, he might as well suicide the next day, because women in every level of society will make his life impossible for doing it.

GoggleHead 1 point ago +5 / -4

This guy gets it.

onetruephilosoraptor 19 points ago +19 / -0

He would get arrested these days for doing that as a white boy.

As much as equal rights should mean equal lefts, our society is way too gynocentric to accept that.

This kid did the smart thing of not hitting a girl while being recorded.

GoggleHead 3 points ago +5 / -2

This isn't a viable long term strategy and the weakness on display here only encourages the girl's bad behavior. At some point there must be actual conflict. Rolling over and taking abuse is not acceptable.

SparkPlasma 3 points ago +5 / -2

I almost think that this type of behaviour from the girl is a sort of frustrated search for a real man who will tell her off. You can see it in the way she talks about him not retaliating:

I don't hit girls

Well I'm hitting you, you're not gonna hit back? Huh?

It seems like she wants him to hit her, but he's too much of a pussy to do it.

Adamrises 5 points ago +5 / -0

I almost think that this type of behaviour from the girl is a sort of frustrated search for a real man who will tell her off.

Punch a feminist in private and she will keel over from the waterfall you just erupted in her.

No woman is stupid enough to think they can take a man. Every woman has it in her to act like a petulant child daring you to enforce your authority on them, and many love it.

GoggleHead 3 points ago +5 / -2

That is exactly what this behavior is. She doesn't necessarily want to get hit, but she wants him to be willing to hit her.

YouAreAPirate 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Fuck them kids” ~ Puritan Left, both ways

Brennus 2 points ago +2 / -0

So where were the adults?

SparkPlasma -4 points ago +6 / -10

Highschool boy? Why are they such twink faggots these days? Someone spits in your face, you knock them out.

the_nybbler 18 points ago +18 / -0

Because if you're a boy and you knock out a girl, they throw the book at you regardless of provocation.

Throwawaycuzmeh 7 points ago +8 / -1

That’s why you file a lawsuit against the school immediately. Boys who drunkenly hook up at college should preemptively file rape charges, too. Conservatives in hostile work places need to have a paper trail rolling at all times. Lawsuits is how you beat this shit.

FromTheShadows 13 points ago +13 / -0

Because in this day and age, if a guy ever hits a girl, everyone will take her side. The students, the school, the cops, the courts. Doesn't matter if she was the one who provoked it and was assaulting him, and that it was recorded. Everyone will take her side, especially once the crocodile tears start pouring.

Knife-TotingRat 3 points ago +3 / -0

That goes back GENERATIONS, even back to the Greatest Generation. Actually look at old entertainment, it sure as fuck didn't glorify woman-beating, and guys who did it - or even threatened it - were meant to be seen as either cads or buffoons. "Boys oughtn't hit girls" is heavy in stuff aimed at kids, though. Charles Schultz showed little girls hitting boys, precisely because it was the inverse of this trope, and seen as harmless and almost silly, as if Lucy couldn't really harm Charlie Brown (a prejudice he seemed to have kept his entire life). And women were free to face-slap men if they got "fresh" or forward .... and the man was assumed to have deserved it, if a women went so far as to BITCH-SLAP them.

SparkPlasma -1 points ago +3 / -4

This guy doesn't even want to hit her though. She's spitting in his face and he's just passively accepting it and spouting canards like "I don't hit girls". He doesn't even really seem angry. Something is wrong with this kid, and many others.

TheImpossible1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Even getting angry runs the risk of reports. No reaction is all you can do.

Source : Was sent to HR once for being "overly anti-social" by cutting short every conversation with female co-workers. I just told them that I care more about getting my job done than making friends. Got a report made against me after it kept happening, so I left. This was at peak MeToo, when everyone silently despised their existence.

One good thing about social distancing, working from home etc. is that women finally have no power over us. We don't have to be near them or talk to them at work anymore.

Everything you do is micro-analysed to see if they can get any angle to attack you using their systems of control.

AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

when everyone silently despised their existence.

I think you're projecting, unless you meant those specific co-workers.