Feminists always like to misrepresent their ideas and opponents, and have done so since the beginnings of feminism. They always either claim they are fighting for equality or completely deny men’s issues in order to perpetuate their belief that they are better than us.
I can't believe I have to explain this, but here we go.
A very, very common feminist tactic early on was to actually push for genuine equality - knowing that it wouldn't ever pass. They would always push it against hostile administrations, knowing they will be shut down.
This evolved into pushing for things that sounded equal but actually stacked the deck heavily in their favor, once they got comfortable in their position.
The true NOW is genuinely evil, to the point that they advised Valerie Solanas in her court case and paid for her lawyer out of pocket.
The fact is, they are always playing mind games. Always trying to look good so they can discredit people who have similar ideas to mine and try and play off their constant slow march towards killing us.
Never trust a word a feminist says. Never trust an action they take without heavily researching and checking absolutely every possible consequence.
We must never allow those who believe in their unearned superiority to bury their true beliefs.
A very, very common feminist tactic early on was to actually push for genuine equality - knowing that it wouldn't ever pass.
They also use this to pretend to care about men’s issues.
Take the fact that men are required to register for selective service and women aren’t, for example. Their solution is to abolish it entirely - which they know will never happen.
When they were less powerful and people were more suspicious of them, they would push equality against tradcon leaders like Bush who would instantly deny it.
They would then never try again with a leadership that supports them, because they don't actually want to win that fight.
I've never seen one properly articulate a reason for being against MRAs other than "they take away our attention."
The rest is always either an appeal to how evil they are or screaming incoherently.
MRAs aren't even really a thing and haven't been for years. They are broken into various "manosphere" factions with wildly different ideas on men's rights. From the pansy "we can all be equal!" idiots to the hedonistic degenerates abusing feminism for pussy.
"We don't like MRA's because we live in a patriarchal society that treats women as lesser!"
How can they say that, and it seems genuinely believe it, when we're talking about how badly men are treated? If we lived in a patriarchal society, men would be treated better than they are, and certainly better than women.
We live in a matriarchal society led by weak, feminine men, whores and psycho butch lesbians.
I like the first reply. It's just kind of blase mean enough. If you give them the benefit of the doubt, that woman is generally saying "Hey, we do care about these things - you guys thinking we don't care about them is really a reason we don't like you because we do legitimately care."
Not curious enough to check her post history, but makes me wonder if she's one of the "feminists" who is utterly unaware of say, Suzanna Danuta Walters, Roxanne Gay, and the plethora of actual feminist leaders who are very much going "No, we fucking hate you because you're No-Vaginas. That's right, you have no vagina and that makes you bad, you fucking No-Vagina!" types.
Feminists always like to misrepresent their ideas and opponents, and have done so since the beginnings of feminism. They always either claim they are fighting for equality or completely deny men’s issues in order to perpetuate their belief that they are better than us.
I can't believe I have to explain this, but here we go.
A very, very common feminist tactic early on was to actually push for genuine equality - knowing that it wouldn't ever pass. They would always push it against hostile administrations, knowing they will be shut down.
This evolved into pushing for things that sounded equal but actually stacked the deck heavily in their favor, once they got comfortable in their position.
The true NOW is genuinely evil, to the point that they advised Valerie Solanas in her court case and paid for her lawyer out of pocket.
The fact is, they are always playing mind games. Always trying to look good so they can discredit people who have similar ideas to mine and try and play off their constant slow march towards killing us.
Never trust a word a feminist says. Never trust an action they take without heavily researching and checking absolutely every possible consequence.
We must never allow those who believe in their unearned superiority to bury their true beliefs.
They also use this to pretend to care about men’s issues.
Take the fact that men are required to register for selective service and women aren’t, for example. Their solution is to abolish it entirely - which they know will never happen.
???
When they were less powerful and people were more suspicious of them, they would push equality against tradcon leaders like Bush who would instantly deny it.
They would then never try again with a leadership that supports them, because they don't actually want to win that fight.
I've never seen one properly articulate a reason for being against MRAs other than "they take away our attention."
The rest is always either an appeal to how evil they are or screaming incoherently.
MRAs aren't even really a thing and haven't been for years. They are broken into various "manosphere" factions with wildly different ideas on men's rights. From the pansy "we can all be equal!" idiots to the hedonistic degenerates abusing feminism for pussy.
"We don't like MRA's because we live in a patriarchal society that treats women as lesser!" How can they say that, and it seems genuinely believe it, when we're talking about how badly men are treated? If we lived in a patriarchal society, men would be treated better than they are, and certainly better than women. We live in a matriarchal society led by weak, feminine men, whores and psycho butch lesbians.
In Norway, when the draft was being extended to women, this was actively opposed by the feminists.
It was also proposed in the States and feminists were ready to take to the streets.
I like the first reply. It's just kind of blase mean enough. If you give them the benefit of the doubt, that woman is generally saying "Hey, we do care about these things - you guys thinking we don't care about them is really a reason we don't like you because we do legitimately care."
Not curious enough to check her post history, but makes me wonder if she's one of the "feminists" who is utterly unaware of say, Suzanna Danuta Walters, Roxanne Gay, and the plethora of actual feminist leaders who are very much going "No, we fucking hate you because you're No-Vaginas. That's right, you have no vagina and that makes you bad, you fucking No-Vagina!" types.