PLEASE report every account that you see attacking film critics, journalists or outlets that reviewed "Cuties" pretending to accuse them of 'supporting pedophiles' for targated harassment - this is now a clear mass pile-on campaign with an agenda
"TarGATEd", GG is on his mind so much it makes him misspell common words. Also I love how to him "tons of people are against CP" is clearly a vast conspiracy but a dozen "gamers are dead" articles from people all on a secret mailing list that declared targets/people to protect is not.
Man it sure is a crazy coincidence that Tulsi, Assange, Greenwald and literally EVERY OTHER "brave" edgelord icon that the "neolib shills" tried to warn you were just carrying water for white nationalism and the alt-right for half a decade now turned out to be EXACTLY THAT right?
Yes kids, he deadass said a Hindu Samoan was "carrying water for white nationalism" because she opposes the sexualization of pre-pub girls.
His stupidity continues: https://archive.is/fF6IQ
Can I ask if you're under the impression the impression that, say, Jackie Chan has actually beaten hundreds if not thousands of men to death with his bare hands and various objects that happen to be lying around during his many, many fight scenes?
Except this movie used actual 11-yr old girls, not stunt doubles. THAT'S THE BIGGEST ISSUE PEOPLE HAVE. It's like if someone made a movie where they brutally beat actual dogs but claimed the movie was showing how abusing animals is bad.
Does anyone know the # for child services? https://archive.is/tCm7F
So I'm helping my mother babysit the nephew (2)
Yeah it's definitely trying to conflate reality and fiction at least. The one thing with Cuties is that they're actually getting young girls to dress up in slutty outfits and do sexual dance moves. It's not something they "pretended to do" it's what they actually did.
One of the biggest issues people have with Cuties is that they used real 11 yr old girls to do the gross shit. It's like if Chan actually did beat men to death but the movie vaguely had the message that violence is wrong.
Your dealing with the guy who admitted to joining bullies in high school just to save his own skin as well as dodging professional help his mother tried to provide for him in order to avoid the stigma of being a special needs kid.
Ofcourse he's that dishonest in his attempt to win an argument. Not that it matters really because in his head he will win the argument because he will have the last word on twitter after you leave in disgust over his asinine behaviour.
I think you meant to type "after he blocks you for disagreeing with him"
Guys its a movie, clearly this 11 year old cameltoe is just cgi.
Said it once, I'll say it a thousand times again. The 'arts' and hollywood are the same as the secret societies of europe in the 17th and 18th centuries and the other 'high art' collectives. Kiddy fuckers for centuries, with it sitting openly in history. French naturalism was literally all over this shit, La Bas is a great book from that which I read on studying the concept of evil. Gilles de Rais was at least interesting as an antihero, these fucks are just lazy.
I think this shit can be traced all the way back to the stone-age, but it's a matter of finding all the threads throughout history and various cultures, and maybe with a bit of looking at stories and myths a little differently than usual (the idea that the stories that survived the centuries did so just because they were always popular, and were originally just fan-fic told for fun, not some "sacred story" .. or that stuff told for fun eventually became sacred via twisting over the course of three or four generations or so. They say history "repeats" itself, but I don't think that's accurate - it cycles, like a spiral, rather than a perfect circle.
And one of the patterns I've started seeing recur since starting down this particular rabbit-hole is that population rise/mass migrations and collapse are not new to modern human populations (modern in the evolutionary sense, that is.) And as far as stories go, if you look at certain stories in the right light, they make far more sense than they do if you mistake metaphor for plain-talk (the so-called "wolf" of Gubbio that St Francis "saved" was no non-human. "Wolf" was simply a cross-cultural slang term for "cut-throat bandit/thief/murderer/rapist who hides in the deep dark woods that regrew after the Roman empire fell and populations dependent on them collapsed" for centuries, and it happened again (after a tentative human recovery) when the Black Death hit. Now do you understand who Little Red Riding Hood really met? Anyay, Francis was preaching loudly to bandits who might hear, not to "beasts and birds", that would be something his detractors would mock him with - ie, "he might as well preach to beasts and birds for all the good it'll do."
If you want to understand a people and their psychology, look at the stories they tell, and remember that a story doesn't have to be true to be important.
Edit: What I'm actually suspecting, on the terms of a huge scale, is that H. sapiens itself (and its direct ancestors) are basically a spitefully-mutated chimp, whose genes have been radiating and collapsing for the past 5 million or so years, and the mutations just keep getting more spiteful over the generations/after population "bottlenecks". The most spiteful are the ones who are the "conspirators" behind the conspiracy theories, that is, humans with abnormal psychology who want to normalize themselves as part of, well, evolutionary competition (even though they are the most maladapted individuals of a maladapted species.) Man is the Jerry Smith of animals, and bears a strong resemblance to the fart-sniffing Prius drivers of South Park's Smug Alert episode.
What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
The mask slips some more.
The best thing about Trump's legacy is his ability to make "the left" reveal their true self, and boy is their true self the pure definition of evil. The left would rather defend pedos than agree with anyone to the right of Mao.
Now if we can only get the normies to actually turn their heads just enough to see them for what they really are.
I just do it because it is funny
Him and Vaush.
You just know that he has a collection of hair in his basement. What a creepy bastard.