My position is liberal and individualist. Women should be capable of defending themselves. Men should absolutely defend their family members. I have always advocated for the position of: "You should kill your rapist".

However, when it comes to threats posed by Islam, neither a rallying cry for white collectivism, nor gender collectivism will work. Collectivism can only be adequately defeated by individualism making it's aggression unsustainable and undirected.

If you can't not rape women, then the women kill you. If you think it's racist or islamaphobic to tell people not to rape, then you can leave. If you won't leave, the only way you can stay is if you don't rape. If you still rape, you still die. At some point, the cost of lost friends and family members will force you to either change your position on the validity of rape culture, or you will leave.

But what if [insert scenario of collective violence]?

The militia system works. A militia can be a formless military deployment. Failure to not violate the most extreme social taboos of a society can regularly end in death without trial. Collective violence only spurs a mass individual mobilization that is still equally formless. Without massive logistical support, the collective aggression always peters out against a dynamic enemy that has no obvious logistical lines or positions. That is the essence of why Sun Tsu said that the pinnacle of military deployment approaches formlessness.