An accusation is not a reason to fire someone. Women have zero credibility in 2020. Without hard evidence, assume they are lying, because you'll be right the vast majority of the time.
The book's fantastic. One of the few books where once I started it I didn't put it down except to eat and sleep.
Curious if you notice any times where it seems like the author is personally sympathetic to the terrorists. There were a couple sections when I found myself thinking "this is going beyond journalistic analysis: the author seems like he's defending them a bit"
After finishing up the first section on the Weather Underground, I do feel like the author comes across as sympathetic to them. I think it's mainly the style of prose though. He tends to really humanize, like at Townhouse where he describes Wilkerson barefooted ironing sheets right before the house explodes.
At other times though, he doesn't shy away from criticizing a lot of common knowledge about Weatherman as propaganda. I.e. their plans always involved actually killing people from the start, regardless of what Ayers might espouse.
I do find it funny that the guys lower on the totem pole he quotes describe what they were doing as playacting (LARPing lel), and Wilkerson blaming townhouse on sexism, rather than you know, none of these wannabe revolutionary academics actually knowing how to handle dynamite
Spawned the cult of Hitler worshipping turds led by a pedophile. You know, the one we're still trying to get rid of somehow? But hey, it can't fail twice right?
Trump will use whatever weapon is available.
He also said that a comment about radical Islamic terrorists was xenophobic. I thought it was sarcasm.
An accusation is not a reason to fire someone. Women have zero credibility in 2020. Without hard evidence, assume they are lying, because you'll be right the vast majority of the time.
Cool, in a perfect world that would be fine. But when your enemy uses these tactics with impunity, it's perfectly fine to use them back.
Muh moral highground is meaningless when you're dead and your children raped and brainwashed
The Left will use the tactics it’s already using.The Right will use Leftist tactics, at which point the Press will become very interested in denormalizing those tactics.
Just started reading Days of Rage actually. Very timely
The book's fantastic. One of the few books where once I started it I didn't put it down except to eat and sleep.
Curious if you notice any times where it seems like the author is personally sympathetic to the terrorists. There were a couple sections when I found myself thinking "this is going beyond journalistic analysis: the author seems like he's defending them a bit"
After finishing up the first section on the Weather Underground, I do feel like the author comes across as sympathetic to them. I think it's mainly the style of prose though. He tends to really humanize, like at Townhouse where he describes Wilkerson barefooted ironing sheets right before the house explodes.
At other times though, he doesn't shy away from criticizing a lot of common knowledge about Weatherman as propaganda. I.e. their plans always involved actually killing people from the start, regardless of what Ayers might espouse.
I do find it funny that the guys lower on the totem pole he quotes describe what they were doing as playacting (LARPing lel), and Wilkerson blaming townhouse on sexism, rather than you know, none of these wannabe revolutionary academics actually knowing how to handle dynamite
You can see it in language itself. Leftist were murderously serious about being 'politically correct' until the right started using it.
-Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung
That went great when we did it to Weinstein.
Spawned the cult of Hitler worshipping turds led by a pedophile. You know, the one we're still trying to get rid of somehow? But hey, it can't fail twice right?
??
You can't tell me their tactics don't remind you of the Nazis.
Whose?
What's the only high profile movement led by a pedophile?
Islam?
Very reasonable.
Utter madness to talk about the 'credibility' of an entire gender.
The crazy thing is limiting this to 'women'.
The 'We do not punish you for lying' is also limited to women, so he isn't completely unreasonably to take that stance, at least personally.