Radical leftists have been rioting and looting for months, and democrats have either ignored or expressly supported all of it.
Qanon has been, at worst, misinforming people online, and that's worthy of forced disavowal by every conservative in the country?
Of course, there are downsides when you refuse to prune your own trees. For example: the democrat party is now overrun with communists and other extremists who are driving the middle towards the opposition.
Honestly, I've always found Qanon to be a sham. Based off of very little evidence, mind you.
The reason I have this bias is because Qanon followers have always tended to hide their hand when describing what their issue is about. It is very much like many other cons when you have an idea of something that's happening, and you hide that information so that it appears more alluring.
"The Secret" was basically a dumb self-help film that was based entirely off this trick, but most conspiracy theories work off of a similar knowledge of some "secret knowledge" of "hidden truth" that the rest of society "isn't prepared for".
You can see it from everything from Scientology, to Yakub, to UFO's, to... well, QAnon.
In all reality, there probably are human trafficking rings for the rich and powerful, just like there are drug trafficking and prostitution rings for them as well. This really shouldn't come as a surprise, I just don't think that it's actually any deeper than that. The world isn't run by pedophiles that want to rape/eat babies or whatever. But there are probably powerful people that want sex slaves, and have the power to get them. We already know that there is a lot of sex slave importation to the US, and it wouldn't surprise me that some were going to influential people.
Hell, I'll go even further than that. I'll say that there are probably bestiality rings for the rich and powerful. If your rich and powerful enough, you can get whatever you want. But these people aren't running the world for their fetishes and degeneracy. They're just running the world normally and are degenerate.
I'd always assumed Qanon to be CoIntel to prevent a pitchfork waving mob from tarring and feathering politicians for never doing anything. The whole "trust the plan" thing lulling people into inaction because "things are happening in the background that you can't know about, so don't worry".
Honestly surprised it's being attacked, unless it's to re-enforce its validity under the premise of "you only take flak when you're over the target".
You know... it wouldn't be the first time the intel agencies spread disinformation as lucrative information among people that were looking into their shit. I think the military did something similar with the UFO fans that kept taking pictures of secret weapon facilities.
This comment is just a reminder that women created white privilege theory, which is the basis of all racial theory that BLM and organizations like it believe in.
No way is he a fed. He's clearly just a wannabe racialist intellectual. That Red Skull monologue he had in Chancellorsville is the sound of genuine impotent rage.
Ah of course. The fact that every action the man takes is exactly what someone trying to subvert an actual right-wing movement would do is just pure coincidence right?
I mean, being made a figurehead of the "alt-right", sperging out continually, endorsing leftist candidates because Trump's not good enough, being to go-to man whenever the right needs to be demonized harder
Come on man, could he glow any harder? I admit that a lot of people who tend to be right-wing online also sperg, but you don't get to be a right-wing sperg on leftist media unless they're paying you. Most people on the right know by now that you hide your power level
That depends on what you are calling a right-wing movement. Ethno-Nationalism is based off of racial justice. He's a progressive, so any lazzie-fare or liberty-focused initiative will be perpetually undermined.
being made figurehead of the alt-right
A progressive seizing power granted to him by corporatists: no surprise
sperging out coninually
Like a racial justice activist
endorsing leftist candidates
Because he's a progressive racialist and wants power in the exact same way that the others do.
being [the] go-to man
See "a progressive seizing power"
I admit that a lot of people who tend to be right-wing online also sperg, but you don't get to be a right-wing sperg on leftist media unless they're paying you.
Their not paying communists to sperg out like retards either, that shit is free. They are definitional: Useful Idiots.
Most people on the right know by now that you hide your power level
I never do. I'll take my political and ideological war honestly and in the open.
If he is what you say he is, how does he manage to still have a Twitter account, with the high profile he has?
... because he's a useful idiot. Corporatists need him to stoke the flames of progressives, who they agitate infinitely to use for political momentum. He's not smart enough to not be a fuck-up. He's also ambitious for power, so he's easy to manipulate.
He doesn't have to be a fed. He's just a useful tool.
They would have kept "Milo Yiannopoulos is the leader of the Alt-Right" narrative if Milo was more useful, but he wasn't. He was too antagonistic. So he had to go, and they kept Spencer around instead
No friends to the right, no enemies to the left.
Radical leftists have been rioting and looting for months, and democrats have either ignored or expressly supported all of it.
Qanon has been, at worst, misinforming people online, and that's worthy of forced disavowal by every conservative in the country?
Of course, there are downsides when you refuse to prune your own trees. For example: the democrat party is now overrun with communists and other extremists who are driving the middle towards the opposition.
Honestly, I've always found Qanon to be a sham. Based off of very little evidence, mind you.
The reason I have this bias is because Qanon followers have always tended to hide their hand when describing what their issue is about. It is very much like many other cons when you have an idea of something that's happening, and you hide that information so that it appears more alluring.
"The Secret" was basically a dumb self-help film that was based entirely off this trick, but most conspiracy theories work off of a similar knowledge of some "secret knowledge" of "hidden truth" that the rest of society "isn't prepared for".
You can see it from everything from Scientology, to Yakub, to UFO's, to... well, QAnon.
In all reality, there probably are human trafficking rings for the rich and powerful, just like there are drug trafficking and prostitution rings for them as well. This really shouldn't come as a surprise, I just don't think that it's actually any deeper than that. The world isn't run by pedophiles that want to rape/eat babies or whatever. But there are probably powerful people that want sex slaves, and have the power to get them. We already know that there is a lot of sex slave importation to the US, and it wouldn't surprise me that some were going to influential people.
Hell, I'll go even further than that. I'll say that there are probably bestiality rings for the rich and powerful. If your rich and powerful enough, you can get whatever you want. But these people aren't running the world for their fetishes and degeneracy. They're just running the world normally and are degenerate.
I'd always assumed Qanon to be CoIntel to prevent a pitchfork waving mob from tarring and feathering politicians for never doing anything. The whole "trust the plan" thing lulling people into inaction because "things are happening in the background that you can't know about, so don't worry".
Honestly surprised it's being attacked, unless it's to re-enforce its validity under the premise of "you only take flak when you're over the target".
You know... it wouldn't be the first time the intel agencies spread disinformation as lucrative information among people that were looking into their shit. I think the military did something similar with the UFO fans that kept taking pictures of secret weapon facilities.
This comment is just a reminder that women created white privilege theory, which is the basis of all racial theory that BLM and organizations like it believe in.
TIL this guy is still relevant.
He's a fed. Of course he'll still be relevant in the news cycle. It's literally what they pay him for
No way is he a fed. He's clearly just a wannabe racialist intellectual. That Red Skull monologue he had in Chancellorsville is the sound of genuine impotent rage.
Ah of course. The fact that every action the man takes is exactly what someone trying to subvert an actual right-wing movement would do is just pure coincidence right?
I mean, being made a figurehead of the "alt-right", sperging out continually, endorsing leftist candidates because Trump's not good enough, being to go-to man whenever the right needs to be demonized harder
Come on man, could he glow any harder? I admit that a lot of people who tend to be right-wing online also sperg, but you don't get to be a right-wing sperg on leftist media unless they're paying you. Most people on the right know by now that you hide your power level
That depends on what you are calling a right-wing movement. Ethno-Nationalism is based off of racial justice. He's a progressive, so any lazzie-fare or liberty-focused initiative will be perpetually undermined.
A progressive seizing power granted to him by corporatists: no surprise
Like a racial justice activist
Because he's a progressive racialist and wants power in the exact same way that the others do.
See "a progressive seizing power"
Their not paying communists to sperg out like retards either, that shit is free. They are definitional: Useful Idiots.
I never do. I'll take my political and ideological war honestly and in the open.
... because he's a useful idiot. Corporatists need him to stoke the flames of progressives, who they agitate infinitely to use for political momentum. He's not smart enough to not be a fuck-up. He's also ambitious for power, so he's easy to manipulate.
He doesn't have to be a fed. He's just a useful tool.
They would have kept "Milo Yiannopoulos is the leader of the Alt-Right" narrative if Milo was more useful, but he wasn't. He was too antagonistic. So he had to go, and they kept Spencer around instead