Couldn't this interpretation be used to prevent people from doing ANYTHING themselves? From the very brief skim of the wiki article, it looks like part of the justification of the Court's interpretation is because the growing of "excess" wheat made it so he didn't have to buy wheat from other farmers and thus affected interstate commerce; therefore, his action of growing extra wheat on his private property, despite not selling it or even giving it to anyone else, can be regulated by the government.
Wheat Lives Matter. Corporations will be fighting to get rid of any private food sources soon. Monsanto kind of already does that by mixing their GMOs into other people's food and claiming ownership. I read an article earlier today about engineering food to make them all RNA vaccines. They will be able to use gene therapy on us just because we want to eat.
People seem to forget just how tyrannical FDR was and laud him over WW2 while conveniently forgetting that he robbed Americans of their gold by EO, then jacked up the value to almost double what they force bought it for after the fact in 1934. The Supreme court antics and the massive failure of the New Deal that required a World War to bail it out. Not to mention internment camps of Japanese American citizens. He was easily in the top 3 worst presidents we've ever had and is only glorified due to the actions and heroism of American citizens during the war.
The New Deal started under Hoover and the world war didn't bail us out of the Great Depression. Roosevelt's death restored market confidence as investors were less terrified of jack boots coming to steal their shit. It wasn't until 1946 that the Great Depression ended.
FDR has her beat on hating the constitution and daddy Bush gets the title of most qualified candidate.
Imagine getting fined for growing and consuming your own wheat I can't think of anything more antithetical to a country founded by a bunch of farmers.
Couldn't this interpretation be used to prevent people from doing ANYTHING themselves? From the very brief skim of the wiki article, it looks like part of the justification of the Court's interpretation is because the growing of "excess" wheat made it so he didn't have to buy wheat from other farmers and thus affected interstate commerce; therefore, his action of growing extra wheat on his private property, despite not selling it or even giving it to anyone else, can be regulated by the government.
Yes that's why this was one of the worst SC decisions ever.
that was the point
Wheat Lives Matter. Corporations will be fighting to get rid of any private food sources soon. Monsanto kind of already does that by mixing their GMOs into other people's food and claiming ownership. I read an article earlier today about engineering food to make them all RNA vaccines. They will be able to use gene therapy on us just because we want to eat.
People seem to forget just how tyrannical FDR was and laud him over WW2 while conveniently forgetting that he robbed Americans of their gold by EO, then jacked up the value to almost double what they force bought it for after the fact in 1934. The Supreme court antics and the massive failure of the New Deal that required a World War to bail it out. Not to mention internment camps of Japanese American citizens. He was easily in the top 3 worst presidents we've ever had and is only glorified due to the actions and heroism of American citizens during the war.
The New Deal started under Hoover and the world war didn't bail us out of the Great Depression. Roosevelt's death restored market confidence as investors were less terrified of jack boots coming to steal their shit. It wasn't until 1946 that the Great Depression ended.
???
FDR's New Deal was Hoovers policies cranked to eleven Hoover massively increased government spending and started siezing industries.