Couldn't this interpretation be used to prevent people from doing ANYTHING themselves? From the very brief skim of the wiki article, it looks like part of the justification of the Court's interpretation is because the growing of "excess" wheat made it so he didn't have to buy wheat from other farmers and thus affected interstate commerce; therefore, his action of growing extra wheat on his private property, despite not selling it or even giving it to anyone else, can be regulated by the government.
Wheat Lives Matter. Corporations will be fighting to get rid of any private food sources soon. Monsanto kind of already does that by mixing their GMOs into other people's food and claiming ownership. I read an article earlier today about engineering food to make them all RNA vaccines. They will be able to use gene therapy on us just because we want to eat.
Imagine getting fined for growing and consuming your own wheat I can't think of anything more antithetical to a country founded by a bunch of farmers.
Couldn't this interpretation be used to prevent people from doing ANYTHING themselves? From the very brief skim of the wiki article, it looks like part of the justification of the Court's interpretation is because the growing of "excess" wheat made it so he didn't have to buy wheat from other farmers and thus affected interstate commerce; therefore, his action of growing extra wheat on his private property, despite not selling it or even giving it to anyone else, can be regulated by the government.
Yes that's why this was one of the worst SC decisions ever.
that was the point
Wheat Lives Matter. Corporations will be fighting to get rid of any private food sources soon. Monsanto kind of already does that by mixing their GMOs into other people's food and claiming ownership. I read an article earlier today about engineering food to make them all RNA vaccines. They will be able to use gene therapy on us just because we want to eat.