Just wanted to vent a bit about my older brother after I was at his son birthday party. We do not talk much so I decided to catch up with his life.
- He got offended when I told him that he is the whitest guy I know. Apparently calling him white was somehow bad. I only said that because without lotion he burns in the sun, full red in a minute.
- We talked about what books he reads now since it is his favorite hobby. Apparently he only reads books with harems in them and lesbians which is fine by me of-course but then he took time to educate me about "the spectrum" which by the way is retarded.
- He only watches movies with a lesbian or at least a bisexual chick as main role
- He told me how good it is to change D&D dark elves and orcs - he does not play it and knows I am a fan - think he only mentioned to piss me off
- He like socialism for some unknown reason, people under socialism worked hard as fuck without having a choice in the matter (parents are from Romania) and he is at a level of lazy that I can not describe.
- Very pro putting social political messages in games/movies and books.
- Totally ignores his son education, the boy was hurting my grandmas dog and he did not care - I mean take him to a doctor behavior not just pull her by the tail. Luckily his wife is a huge capitalist fan, conservative, daughter of an ortodox priest so the kid will be fine.
- Hates J.K. Rowling now :)) I wonder why as he used to be a fan. I chuckled at this one.
- And the worst part he apparently hates me for not being miserable - not kidding. Just because I like what I do (although the company is "progressive"), I love my beautiful wife and I watch my health apparently is somehow privilege although we are brothers and had the same start.
Conclusion: He apparently developed some kind of kinks I do not want to know. He is doing poorly at his job because he is lazy and would rather read then do his work. Hates society and anyone who is happy. Hates being a white male. And wants everyone to be miserable and remove the opportunity to be successful from others. How high does this rank on a SJW scale?
Bonus: What my grandma has to say about socialism: If you are in a point in life where someone else tells you what to do and what to think then you are the same as dead. (is a rough translation from Romanian)
I honestly think he is trying to develop some form, any form of kink so that he can describe himself as non-binary or something like that. He just wants to be a victim so bad but being a white guy who likes girls is in his way and is so unfair to him.
This is part of the issue I have with the continuing expansion of the LGB> label.
Those 3 address sexuality, and even then B and L are the same thing, attraction to the same sex so homosexuality, so really H would cover things there and be far more consistent with the use of B.
Everything else that comes after that has nothing to do with sexual attraction, being either personal identity or a particular fetish, like sapiosexuality. Being attracted to smart people isn't something special, just like being attracted to strong people, or fast people isn't something special. Competitive evolutionary traits are attractive to people because from a biology perspective those are traits which can benefit a partner and the potential offspring they may create.
Oddly enough it's most of the other groups beyond B that are the ones in high profile stories drawing ire, even from within the group itself. See "drop the T" or whatever the thing is.
I suppose that is more common - over the last 4-6 years I've seen such behavior all over the various communities I follow - people who are very obviously cis (and often very obviously straight as well) deciding to start constantly talking about any non-vanilla turn-on they might have.
It typically ends with them eventually coming out as 'non-binary', or 'genderqueer' and slapping some pronouns on their profile page. None of it means anything other than 'I've become a radical leftist'.
It's interesting how they perceive being white to be vanilla, or boring. I guess because straight white Christian men are the norm and they want to be "special". If his frame of reference wasn't limited to the US, he would understand how rare we are globally.
There are a lot of presumptions like this which often mix concepts up to the point they become interchangeable by some despite being incorrect.
Dom/Domme and Top/sub and bottom being a very common one for example. Likewise associations between both of those and sex, in part due to prevalence of the majority of Dominants/Tops being men and the majority of subs/bottoms being women.
So an expectation forms, not entirely unrealistically, due to group demographs.