Plus the comparison to drugs is more of a conservative rallying cry than anything feminist.
Terry's good people. He's also seemingly pretty religious, and I'd put good money he's getting the anti-porn ideas from that end of the spectrum rather than some secret feminist agenda.
Pretty sure there's more porn on the internet than just the PH network, and plenty of other "free" sites salivating over the chance to fill that kind of sudden gap in the market.
I agree, porn is very addictive and is not good for people. The use of porn is too normalized, the porn industry is bad for women and men(gay men in particular) both psychologically and health wise, and creates this fake notion, that these women would not be negatively affected after they're no longer valued in the industry. Pornhub has a history of hosting rape videos as well.
Being anti-porn is not solely a radfem position to hold. I would argue that porn use holds men back significantly, since their sex drive would motivate them to seek out relationships with actual women, forcing the men to improve themselves as necessary
He's actually an addict. The radicals think the problems should be fixed for them, not that they are the problem. As far as I know, we don't subsidize that site at all and if you want to go on it, it's your prerogative. The site has been pushing the same stuff since inception. It's not like NASCAR which all of a sudden insulted and alienated all the people who pay for it.
The situation is not the same at all, but Crews is using both conservative and radical movements for his own gain.
Keep in mind that, along with the other things already stated by other users here, porn is produced almost exclusively by human traffickers. You're getting a perspective on sex that comes from some of the worst humans alive.
If this Andrea also happens to believe that fast food is bad for you, I'm not going to gorge myself on McDonalds to spite her. Claiming that porn is good for you because there are some shitty people who believe it's bad is an intellectually bankrupt argument.
Crews is definitely a simp, but he's pretty based regarding other issues and has more spine and integrity than 99% of other famous actors. If he responded to having his father run out on him and being raised by a single mother by developing an overly-favorable view of women, I'd say that's better than getting repeatedly locked up for drugs and violent crime and then trying to burn down Western civilization for its "racism".
Just going to lay it out there but there are also more conservative antifems who are equally against porn.
Plus the comparison to drugs is more of a conservative rallying cry than anything feminist.
Terry's good people. He's also seemingly pretty religious, and I'd put good money he's getting the anti-porn ideas from that end of the spectrum rather than some secret feminist agenda.
Pretty sure there's more porn on the internet than just the PH network, and plenty of other "free" sites salivating over the chance to fill that kind of sudden gap in the market.
Xvideos would likely become the new porn hub.
Isn't that one of PH's acquisitions? I vaguely recall seeing they bought/run a lot of the 2nd fiddle knockoffs too.
"Without porn, men might have to seek real relationships!"
What kind of incel bullshit is this?
You're hawking the exact same self destructive bullshit as radfems, with a different paint job.
I guess we'll just have to hope that there are more than five porn sites on the internet.
Dude, disliking porn doesn't make someone a radfem.
Which consequences? That you have to use your head if you want to mastubate? Have some faith in your fantasies xD
I agree, porn is very addictive and is not good for people. The use of porn is too normalized, the porn industry is bad for women and men(gay men in particular) both psychologically and health wise, and creates this fake notion, that these women would not be negatively affected after they're no longer valued in the industry. Pornhub has a history of hosting rape videos as well.
Being anti-porn is not solely a radfem position to hold. I would argue that porn use holds men back significantly, since their sex drive would motivate them to seek out relationships with actual women, forcing the men to improve themselves as necessary
He's actually an addict. The radicals think the problems should be fixed for them, not that they are the problem. As far as I know, we don't subsidize that site at all and if you want to go on it, it's your prerogative. The site has been pushing the same stuff since inception. It's not like NASCAR which all of a sudden insulted and alienated all the people who pay for it.
The situation is not the same at all, but Crews is using both conservative and radical movements for his own gain.
Keep in mind that, along with the other things already stated by other users here, porn is produced almost exclusively by human traffickers. You're getting a perspective on sex that comes from some of the worst humans alive.
Don't cut yourself on that edge.
If this Andrea also happens to believe that fast food is bad for you, I'm not going to gorge myself on McDonalds to spite her. Claiming that porn is good for you because there are some shitty people who believe it's bad is an intellectually bankrupt argument.
Nice straw man, shill.
Crews is definitely a simp, but he's pretty based regarding other issues and has more spine and integrity than 99% of other famous actors. If he responded to having his father run out on him and being raised by a single mother by developing an overly-favorable view of women, I'd say that's better than getting repeatedly locked up for drugs and violent crime and then trying to burn down Western civilization for its "racism".
Probably posts on the radfem forum at https://consumeproduct.win/