im a rather convinced poliamorist. meaning conceptually i believe it to be the superior intimacy form. (one might add relationship anarchy as the ultimate standard - total flexibility)
i saw that kia2 was mostly opposing this? how come ?
my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions
our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility
the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels
fyi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.
well not giving a shit sounds a bit exxagerated. what about pedophilia?
why not explore the conflict conceptually to understand exactly where the harm is . if any. i mean sure, its hardly the rosy context to discuss such things. im also promoting traditional values for the time being till the cultural value system gets a bit more fit for challenges
This is a case of not seeing the forest for the trees here.
We can discuss it, but ultimately the fact that you have that sexual arrangement is entirely meaningless to every last one of us so we don't really care.
We only have issues if you start to demand that we must like your choices and that they are immune from criticism.
Not a comparison you probably want to make?