im a rather convinced poliamorist. meaning conceptually i believe it to be the superior intimacy form. (one might add relationship anarchy as the ultimate standard - total flexibility)
i saw that kia2 was mostly opposing this? how come ?
my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions
our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility
the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels
fyi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.
This is a case of not seeing the forest for the trees here.
We can discuss it, but ultimately the fact that you have that sexual arrangement is entirely meaningless to every last one of us so we don't really care.
We only have issues if you start to demand that we must like your choices and that they are immune from criticism.