Amendment XXVIII Section 1.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, effects, communications, information, and other private affairs against unreasonable searches, seizures, surveillance, and invasions of privacy shall not be violated.
Neither the United States, nor any State, nor any political subdivision or instrumentality thereof, shall evade the limitations of this Constitution by directing, requesting, encouraging, compensating, contracting with, coordinating with, or otherwise causing any private person, corporation, organization, foreign government, or other non-governmental actor to collect, retain, analyze, search, monitor, or disclose information where such conduct would constitute an unreasonable search or seizure if performed directly by the government.
Information obtained in violation of this Article, and any evidence or investigative leads derived therefrom, shall not be admitted in any judicial, administrative, legislative, or executive proceeding, nor serve as the basis for warrants, arrests, prosecutions, or other governmental action.
Section 2.
Neither the United States nor any State shall acquire, purchase, license, compel, or otherwise obtain access to records, communications, location information, behavioral information, biometric information, or other personal information in bulk or through generalized or indiscriminate collection, except pursuant to standards consistent with this Constitution and directed toward identified persons, places, accounts, or things for which individualized legal justification exists.
The constitutional protections secured by this Article shall not be diminished solely because information is possessed, stored, processed, transmitted, or maintained by another person or entity.
Section 3.
Nothing in this Article shall prohibit:
(a) any person from voluntarily reporting specific observations, evidence, or firsthand knowledge of actual or suspected criminal activity;
(b) law enforcement officers from receiving such reports, interviewing witnesses, requesting voluntary cooperation, or conducting investigations otherwise consistent with this Constitution;
(c) private persons or entities from maintaining security measures for their own persons or property and voluntarily providing information relating to a particular event or investigation;
(d) disclosures otherwise required pursuant to a warrant, subpoena, court order, or other lawful process consistent with this Constitution.
Section 4.
Congress and the several States shall have power to enforce this Article by appropriate legislation consistent with its provisions.
I'll be shocked if any constitutional amendment passes in the remainder of my lifetime, and if it does it won't be one I like. It will be criticism of Jews isn't free speech amendment or some bullshit.
I mean, maybe, after the boomers are gone. They are suspect #1 of "if it catches a bad guy, I'm not doing anything wrong so I don't mind." Even after that we have a barrier of so many elected officials. We are seeing local politicians in small towns brazenly defying pretty much the entirety of their constituents, and it's going to have to start there. With the state of elections, it's also going to have to start some way other than that. We may very well see some more bulldozer guys. I'm not convinced the elections aren't even more rigged than I thought though, and that plus all the security details protects all of those politicians so well.
The loophole of government and law enforcement using 'private companies' to do all their surveillance and tracking, as well as the agreements with other Five Eyes and similar arrangement with foreign nations to conduct mass surveillance, tracking, data collection and analysis, and privacy invasions, and saying that they are not violating the Constitution simple because they are the recipients of the results, not the ones conducting the surveillance itself, needs to be closed. If government would be prohibited from putting a camera or a microphone in your house or on your front porch just to see what illegal activity they can rummage up, it should be equally illegal for Amazon or Google or the rest to do it for them and just give them the data afterwards.
Government must not be allowed to do indirectly via private proxies or foreign partners what the Constitution forbids it from doing directly.