Can you blame women for abandoning objective morality and acting in their atomised self-interest? No. We would all do the same.

Uh, wut?

Edit: Okay, it was a rhetorical point, but it actually demonstrates that it is "all women" because men generally don't think this way. Even the example with his mother, she acts in her own atomised self-interest but gives the opposite answer because she doesn't want an ex-whore as the mother of her grandchildren.

I think this is a matter of being right by mistake. Women are subverting politics by not considering the good of the larger group, which is behaviour innate to their sex. They do this because they have a biological imperative to secure assistance and support in bearing and raising children, while men have the imperarive to care for everyone; his wife, their children, and himself. This is the attitude needed to create a productive citizen as opposed to an opportunistic freeloader (and why women, morally, need to submit to the person taking responsibility for her well-being). It's simply an extension of hypergamy.

So what he's saying is correct, but the solution literally is "abolish the 19th" (which he rejects at the outset) because women's well-documented hypergamy is in direct opposition to what makes a good citizen. They aren't "using the wrong identity group", they're just asking "what if it were me". Even the women with kids are doing this, the only difference is that they already made the sacrifice so they don't care about the women who didn't.

At best, women should only be granted democratic rights in the case of them performing exceptionally civic acts. Culturally speaking, the harder women have it in life, the less likely they'll be to make excuses for others not doing their share.