I'm glad you brought this up because it actually reinforces my point about rootlessness.
The CCP isn't beholden to anyone but the CCP; it is an amoral coalition of people thinking only about what's best for them within their own lifetimes. This resulted in them adhering to immoral policies (i.e., the one-child policy) to fix something that wasn't a problem to begin with.
They didn't mind killing off one of half the entire future generation of their nation, something that would have been a reprehensible act under a religious nation that adhered to its principles.
The knockon effect of this immoral decision has now had economical implications that has enforced social implications (videlicet of double the male population for the current generation, not enough job growth, shrinking marriage rates, women only seeking top-performing men, top-performing men selectively using women for sex but not marriage or creating families, etc.).
Now the CCP is trying to rapidly course-correct with government-sponsored marriage incentives, state-sponsored programs to encourage child-rearing. But it's all for nought because it's too late. Why?
Because in their lack of foresight they adopted the worst economic traits of feminist-captured Western societies: encouraging women to compete with men, abandon household duties, and pursue lifelong careers in competitive white-collar systems.
You're also correct that a lot of those pointless administrative jobs will be replaced by automotons and AI, making the female-focused workforce redundant.
Basically, the short-term solution to perceived resource shortages was to kill off one-half of their FUTURE population, which backfired immensely. They didn't account for marriage rates rapidly declining, top percentile men becoming philanderers, women becoming even more hypergamous, jobs shrinking, their main population aging out without financial recourse, and AI becoming a main replacement for useless corporate jobs.
Their economic downfall was because they had no moral foundations
Had they instead focused on cultivating jobs for their lower and middle class men -- exponentially reinvesting in farming and agriculture, and prioritising hiring young males for work -- they would have automatically created a sustainable ecosystem for women to WANT to marry young lads. They would have had a balanced population with enough excess women for the average bloke, and they wouldn't have had women competing with the men they sought to marry.
In many ways, the CCP is a prime example of what grounding your economic and social policies around short-term materialistic precepts looks like, and a nice counter-example as to why athiestic foundations cannot build nor sustain a growing, stable civilisaiton.
I'm glad you brought this up because it actually reinforces my point about rootlessness.
The CCP isn't beholden to anyone but the CCP; it is an amoral coalition of people thinking only about what's best for them within their own lifetimes. This resulted in them adhering to immoral policies (i.e., the one-child policy) to fix something that wasn't a problem to begin with.
They didn't mind killing off one of half the entire future generation of their nation, something that would have been a reprehensible act under a religious nation that adhered to its principles.
The knockon effect of this immoral decision has now had economical implications that has enforced social implications (videlicet of double the male population for the current generation, not enough job growth, shrinking marriage rates, women only seeking top-performing men, top-performing men selectively using women for sex but not marriage or creating families, etc.).
Now the CCP is trying to rapidly course-correct with government-sponsored marriage incentives, state-sponsored programs to encourage child-rearing. But it's all for nought because it's too late. Why?
Because in their lack of foresight they adopted the worst economic traits of feminist-captured Western societies: encouraging women to compete with men, abandon household duties, and pursue lifelong careers in competitive white-collar systems.
You're also correct that a lot of those pointless administrative jobs will be replaced by automotons and AI, making the female-focused workforce redundant.
Basically, the short-term solution to perceived resource shortages was to kill off one-half of their FUTURE population, which backfired immensely. They didn't account for marriage rates rapidly declining, top percentile men becoming philanderers, women becoming even more hypergamous, jobs shrinking, their main population aging out without financial recourse, and AI becoming a main replacement for useless corporate jobs.
Their economic downfall was because they had no moral foundations
Had they instead focused on cultivating jobs for their lower and middle class men -- exponentially reinvesting in farming and agriculture, and prioritising hiring young males for work -- they would have automatically created a sustainable ecosystem for women to WANT to marry young lads. They would have had a balanced population with enough excess women for the average bloke, and they wouldn't have had women competing with the men they sought to marry.
In many ways, the CCP is a prime example of what grounding your economic and social policies around short-term materialistic precepts looks like, and a nice counter-example as to why athiestic foundations cannot build nor sustain a growing, stable civilisaiton.