completely silent on that same issue for the entire time Biden was in office.
You mean when republicans didn't have power to do anything legislative? Yeah, how weird that he only got vocal after republicans were put back in power with a mandate from the voters.
And this doesn't even get into the fact that he wasn't silent about it under Biden. Every time this gets brought up on X you'll have multiple tweets and clips posted in the replies of him talking about it during Biden's term.
But hmm, I wonder why he brought it up a lot more under Trump. Could it possibly be because it was brought up several times by Trump and high level people in the administration as something they would go after? And then they proceeded to switch gears into the most obvious cover up in history? Could it be because of that?
Anyone actually going after Massie for "grandstanding" over Epstein needs to take a big long look in the mirror, because you're either retarded, evil, or both. Even if it's completely self serving (safe to assume for a politician), it's infinitely better than covering for it.
Yes, because Massie is certainly not known for political grandstanding by introducing bills and motions that he knows are never going to get passed just to draw attention to important issues himself. That logic might have worked before his AIPAC bill.
You mean when republicans didn't have power to do anything legislative? Yeah, how weird that he only got vocal after republicans were put back in power with a mandate from the voters.
And this doesn't even get into the fact that he wasn't silent about it under Biden. Every time this gets brought up on X you'll have multiple tweets and clips posted in the replies of him talking about it during Biden's term.
But hmm, I wonder why he brought it up a lot more under Trump. Could it possibly be because it was brought up several times by Trump and high level people in the administration as something they would go after? And then they proceeded to switch gears into the most obvious cover up in history? Could it be because of that?
Anyone actually going after Massie for "grandstanding" over Epstein needs to take a big long look in the mirror, because you're either retarded, evil, or both. Even if it's completely self serving (safe to assume for a politician), it's infinitely better than covering for it.
You mean zionistgnome was lying again? What a shock.
Yes, because Massie is certainly not known for political grandstanding by introducing bills and motions that he knows are never going to get passed just to draw attention to
important issueshimself. That logic might have worked before his AIPAC bill.