Why Young Men Are Giving Up
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
Yes, that's true. Everything changes fast so knowledge can become outdated. So then you need to go out and learn new things, hands on.
She still has no values and she still is a piece of shit sub human. It's about what she represents. And because hating her is the righteous thing to do. Just because she treats you like a human being, doesn't mean she is a decent human being who is worthy of not being hated. But you want to be on the wrong side of history, just because she treats you like a human being. When you are tolerant of shit, you are signing off on shit. EDIT: Everything about her is literally the opposite of traditionalism. So unless you think traditionalism is absolute shit and are a massive liberal who loves degeneracy, it makes no sense not to hate her.
It would actually if most men started hating women like her. Because women don't want to be hated by most men in society. Women want to fit in. The reason so many women today are the way they are is because not only are there so many men who are simps who will simp for women no matter what. But because so many men are tolerant of these women. And the # of men who hate these women is not high enough to scare them into not growing up into being pieces of shit.
But let's say, 90% of men hated them and refused to do anything with them. These women wouldn't be able to handle that. It's too much hate for them to handle. EDIT: Women love the attention they get from angry men. But I'm talking about hatred. Men who truly hate women, cut women off from attention and so many other things that women need or want.
Why? If the government disappeared, you'd still be dealing with the same problems except you'd have more money. Because the government isn't entirely behind the feminism and simping. And not so much more money, you'd be able to throw money at all your problems to make them go away. Feminist whores and simps would still exist.
You underestimate how much the government matters for simps.
Most jobs women work are government subsidized. Without the government subsidizing these jobs, you now have women without resources who need resources. What does that mean? The supply of women seeking simps goes up. When the supply goes up the cost comes down. Thus simps would need to spend less on women to get what they want from women.
The simp phenomenon is entirely created by the government taxing men and giving these resources to women. Without a government doing this the level of simping in society goes way down and women as a whole end up with less while men end up with more.
If you want to eliminate simps then eliminate the government.
What you described would just lower the cost of hookers. It wouldn't bring back actual traditionalism. I'm not saying, life wouldn't get better for men. But the liberalism and feminism would still be there. And women would still be behaving like shit. They'd just be more reasonable with their prices as hookers. Maybe give discounts sometimes. Simps will never go away. Because of feminism. They worship women as goddesses. EDIT: Even without the government as soon as some hooker falsely accuses you of rape, a dozen white knights will try to murder you. And they will be even more determined because they won't have to worry about the government hunting them down and putting them in prison for breaking laws.
Lowering the price of hookers is still a great thing. Traditionalism is dead and isn't coming back.