So, Manoj Govindbalunikam saw a 9-year-old boy fishing at the river and asked if he wanted a ride home and offered him a fidget spinner to play with. He told him to go ahead and leave his fishing tackle and bike behind because it wouldn't fit in his car.
Then he took the boy out for ice cream. Then he asked the boy for his home address. He drove to the home address, but apparently didn't come to a complete stop. He slowed down to like two miles an hour and started accelerating again.
The boy's father saw his son in the car with a stranger, and came out screaming to get the fuck away from his son, which Govindbalunikam did.
Nothing sexual or violent happened, and he doesn't have any other history suggestive of being a pedo, but it's a huge what the fuck was that. In any culture, I'd think. I don't think there's any culture where it's cool to just pick up other people's kids and drive them around town.
He was sentenced to 18 months in jail, and I don't believe there's been a deportation hearing yet.
I don't know what his motive was. I don't know if he's simply a pedophile, or if he had some emotionally-fucked-up reason to want to play Big Brother for a few hours, or if there are voices in his head telling him to protect the kid from the Terminator, or just what the fuck that was all about.
Obviously it's wrong to take a kid for a drive while his parents panic. And obviously it's a lot more wrong if he was about to molest the kid than if the kid was never in any real danger. Those two crimes are quite different, and the penalty for them should be very different.
Motive is everything in a case like this. It's all I'd want to know if I were somehow in charge of sentencing him.
If he wanted to molest this kid, I want him locked away for life. If he just wanted to push the kid on a swing and drive him back home, I want him locked up for maybe like two months and then put under supervision for a few years, just as a very strong "Don't do that shit, you might think it's harmless but it terrifies parents. It's downright fucking traumatic. Never do anything like that again."
Looked it up. Weird fucking story.
So, Manoj Govindbalunikam saw a 9-year-old boy fishing at the river and asked if he wanted a ride home and offered him a fidget spinner to play with. He told him to go ahead and leave his fishing tackle and bike behind because it wouldn't fit in his car.
Then he took the boy out for ice cream. Then he asked the boy for his home address. He drove to the home address, but apparently didn't come to a complete stop. He slowed down to like two miles an hour and started accelerating again.
The boy's father saw his son in the car with a stranger, and came out screaming to get the fuck away from his son, which Govindbalunikam did.
Nothing sexual or violent happened, and he doesn't have any other history suggestive of being a pedo, but it's a huge what the fuck was that. In any culture, I'd think. I don't think there's any culture where it's cool to just pick up other people's kids and drive them around town.
He was sentenced to 18 months in jail, and I don't believe there's been a deportation hearing yet.
So a child kidnapping in broad daylight isn't enough for you?
Since you got here you've refused to make a lot of very simple moral judgments but this just might take the cake.
I don't know what his motive was. I don't know if he's simply a pedophile, or if he had some emotionally-fucked-up reason to want to play Big Brother for a few hours, or if there are voices in his head telling him to protect the kid from the Terminator, or just what the fuck that was all about.
Obviously it's wrong to take a kid for a drive while his parents panic. And obviously it's a lot more wrong if he was about to molest the kid than if the kid was never in any real danger. Those two crimes are quite different, and the penalty for them should be very different.
Motive is entirely irrelevant. So why you're trying for that besides an obvious attempt at a red herring, I'd have to speculate.
Personally I think you're feigning ignorance.
You even quoted a very important part as to this pajeet subhuman's intent yourself but you seem to have missed it.
Motive is everything in a case like this. It's all I'd want to know if I were somehow in charge of sentencing him.
If he wanted to molest this kid, I want him locked away for life. If he just wanted to push the kid on a swing and drive him back home, I want him locked up for maybe like two months and then put under supervision for a few years, just as a very strong "Don't do that shit, you might think it's harmless but it terrifies parents. It's downright fucking traumatic. Never do anything like that again."