For Trump alone, there have been 3 different incidents:
- Butler, Pennsylvania - 1 audience member killed, 2 others injured
- West Palm Beach, Florida - Traffic stop resulted in injuries to a 6-year old girl
- White House Correspondents Dinner
Charlie Kirk's killer was also not identified based on pre-trial facts regarding the weapon and force. There are also some who question the sincerity of his widow.
So, with that said, why did they stage the press dinner? Which, if any, of the other events were also false flags?
Charlie's killer cannot credibly be what is stated based on public facts since the caliber of weapon doesn't align with happenings. The bullet force should be larger than it was.
No, it shouldn't. The 30-06 round was the primary round used by the US for both WWI and WWII, producing 1-2 million casualties overall, many of which were well documented in various after action reports, medical reports, etc. What the 30-06 round can do when it enters the human body is in fact one of the most well documented and understood ballistic effects in the history of firearms. Hell, the US Army even wrote a book about it called "Wound Ballistics in World War II". Charlie's wound was well within that established baseline.
Stop listening to crackpots on Rumble. It's bad for your head.
I think I'll continue listening to ballistic experts on YouTube that examined the footage closely and making my own opinions rather than an unhinged social media poster like you who goes on 4+ lengthy paragraphs making psychological projections.
The bullet didn't have enough force. And that's the main inconsistency in the saga, never mind a myriad of other topics that another user touched upon.
You're genuinely a low IQ lunatic.
I don't think you understood this the first time because you are brain dead, but I don't care about your arm-chair diagnostics.
Maybe you can join MLGS, he's been raring to continue guzzling excrement and semen out of Trump's anus. There's a few of you that can gather together for the shit bukkake.