Bondi, Kash and Bongino did their best over the past year to convince US that there's nothing to see. Everything unredacted indicates that this is not true. The narrative that the redactions are to protect the innocent couldn't be further from the truth. It's exactly the opposite. They're there to protect despicable elitist criminals many of whom are known to the President. Slight conflict of interest?
Edit: Does anyone know that Trump's closest friend and mentor growing up was directly involved in running a pedophile bribery extortion racket of leaders in politics and business before his death of AIDS in 86? Who took over on all those extortion accounts after he passed? Epstein walks into the conversation. Donald knew Epstein for nearly two decades. What are the odds that Donald knows nothing of both of his closest friends criminal endeavors or those involved or even those caught up in the racket? Zero chance is my guess. He is in at the very least a conflict of interest in appearance. Enough to warrant recusal and change of venue. Why this case is allowed to be under his authority baffles my mind. IMHO
Bondi, Kash and Bongino did their best over the past year to convince US that there's nothing to see. Everything unredacted indicates that this is not true. The narrative that the redactions are to protect the innocent couldn't be further from the truth. It's exactly the opposite. They're there to protect despicable elitist criminals many of whom are known to the President. Slight conflict of interest?
Edit: Does anyone know that Trump's closest friend and mentor growing up was directly involved in running a pedophile bribery extortion racket of leaders in politics and business before his death of AIDS in 86? Who took over on all those extortion accounts after he passed? Epstein walks into the conversation. Donald knew Epstein for nearly two decades. What are the odds that Donald knows nothing of both of his closest friends criminal endeavors or those involved or even those caught up in the racket? Zero chance is my guess. He is in at the very least a conflict of interest in appearance. Enough to warrant recusal and change of venue. Why this case is allowed to be under his authority baffles my mind. IMHO