Not sure how the UN vote is an argument against the 'stolen land' thesis. Does the UN have the legal right to give someone else's country away to a bunch of interlopers? Perhaps, certainly not the moral right - and let's be real, they don't even believe in the UN's legitimacy as they are now being criticized by it.
Furthermore, they didn't just take 55%. They took half the land set aside for the native population as well. Then they took the rest in 1967. Living space and all.
Not sure how the UN vote is an argument against the 'stolen land' thesis. Does the UN have the legal right to give someone else's country away to a bunch of interlopers? Perhaps, certainly not the moral right - and let's be real, they don't even believe in the UN's legitimacy as they are now being criticized by it.
Furthermore, they didn't just take 55%. They took half the land set aside for the native population as well. Then they took the rest in 1967. Living space and all.
That's my point. Lawfare in the history books.