Your example is the NYT blatantly lying, not subtly influencing public opinion. The funny thing is they could name the list something with no objective standard ("best" or "most impactful" are just 2 examples that come to mind here) like the various Pedowood award shows and it would achieve its purpose of conning normies into consuming their slop.
Your example is the NYT blatantly lying, not subtly influencing public opinion. The funny thing is they could name the list something with no objective standard ("best" or "most impactful" are just 2 examples that come to mind here) like the various Pedowood award shows and it would achieve its purpose of conning normies into consuming their slop.