Everyone thinks that they've wizened up to the whole WMDs in Iraq narrative, and yet they're falling for it again, hook, line, and sinker. The only difference is that you change one letter in the word 'Iraq' and start talking about the country next door.
cut babies' heads off
Where have we all heard that before? Ah, yes... The 'fifty beheaded babies' nonsense from October 7.
You wonder: Why is it that they recycle, regurgitate these false narratives with no originality, almost verbatim?
Then you realize: they know that it actually still works on, that it is still convincing to, the average person. So why should they go through the extra work involved in trying to make something more convincing or more original?
Is your statement they went through 36k dead bodies, checked idenfications, tracked down all their families, and chopped off their heads, especially the babies then?
Everyone thinks that they've wizened up to the whole WMDs in Iraq narrative, and yet they're falling for it again, hook, line, and sinker. The only difference is that you change one letter in the word 'Iraq' and start talking about the country next door.
Where have we all heard that before? Ah, yes... The 'fifty beheaded babies' nonsense from October 7.
You wonder: Why is it that they recycle, regurgitate these false narratives with no originality, almost verbatim?
Then you realize: they know that it actually still works on, that it is still convincing to, the average person. So why should they go through the extra work involved in trying to make something more convincing or more original?
Do you think they killed over thirty six thousand protestors and then what? Sent their children to orphanages?
36k protestors brought their babies to the protests?
Are you stupid or something? Is that actually how you read my statement?
Is your statement they went through 36k dead bodies, checked idenfications, tracked down all their families, and chopped off their heads, especially the babies then?