Realistically they aren't going willing so they would have to be put into some sort of cage, containers are easily adapted to that. Both passenger and cargo planes have a way higher demand than cruise ships.
I also wouldn't want to think about the logistics of food for a ship, I don't like anyone to suffer horribly if they are actually leaving. If it's a 6-12h flight like it would be in Europe you just need a pallet of water bottles and a bucket toilet. Get some battery powered LED lights taped to the roof and you're good.
If this is done in combination with cutting out the gibs many will leave voluntarily.
The idea is to use existing high demand infrastructure that can be repurposed using as little manpower as possible.
I get what you're describing. It sounds like how we treat soldiers, so I agree its humane. But, the difference between 1000 trips, and one gigantic trip seems more efficient to my mind. I even thought about if they get off, they'd be some other places problem because getting off would mean they wouldn't be eligible to try to reenter the correct way. Most of the people being deported are being told to either apply again, or wait a specific amount of time before they are eligible to apply legally.
The one's not eligible for reentry are the one the article posted yesterday about the US sending them to other countries was about. We won't make them go home if any other country is willing to take them. They're just getting mad the only countries willing to take them have been very few African countries.
Realistically they aren't going willing so they would have to be put into some sort of cage, containers are easily adapted to that. Both passenger and cargo planes have a way higher demand than cruise ships.
I also wouldn't want to think about the logistics of food for a ship, I don't like anyone to suffer horribly if they are actually leaving. If it's a 6-12h flight like it would be in Europe you just need a pallet of water bottles and a bucket toilet. Get some battery powered LED lights taped to the roof and you're good.
If this is done in combination with cutting out the gibs many will leave voluntarily.
The idea is to use existing high demand infrastructure that can be repurposed using as little manpower as possible.
I get what you're describing. It sounds like how we treat soldiers, so I agree its humane. But, the difference between 1000 trips, and one gigantic trip seems more efficient to my mind. I even thought about if they get off, they'd be some other places problem because getting off would mean they wouldn't be eligible to try to reenter the correct way. Most of the people being deported are being told to either apply again, or wait a specific amount of time before they are eligible to apply legally.
The one's not eligible for reentry are the one the article posted yesterday about the US sending them to other countries was about. We won't make them go home if any other country is willing to take them. They're just getting mad the only countries willing to take them have been very few African countries.