I was reading "Discours de la Servitude Volontaire" (Discourse on voluntary servitude), a very old book written by a 18-19 year old "Étienne de la Boétie" who discusses basically why people obey and serve.
My interrogations began when I went for a dental cleaning. The hygienist spent a whole hour with me. The dentist saw me at most I'd say a minute.
The hygienist makes 60,000$ per year, of which the government will rob $20,000 "at source." This leaves her with $40,000 per year, or a bit over $3,300 net per month.
The dentists makes well over $500,000. Of course, it's considered business income, so it is taxed at 8% maximum (if it is taxed at all). He can of course pay himself a dividend, which is not-taxed for the first $60,000 (our lady's whole salary), and then at half the rate that lady's income. With a huge tax credit and really no deduction.
Still too high? Go for capital gains, deduce everything, and you will pay 10-15% taxes.
And I got to think: how exactly is that fair? First, how is it fair that the dentist makes so much more than her? Who would accept to work for 10% of the salary of their coworkers? Yes, dentist requires more skill, more studies, more education, and comes with risk. Yes you have to diagnose horrible stuff from time to time and if you mess up, consequences are bad. But is it really worth 10 times the salary of that hygienist?
With huge tax benefits? I'm a teacher and I net around the same amount as that hygienist. I also have university education, and I teach kids, which should be important (it's not but whatever).
Is what this dentist doing worth really that much more than me?
I don't understand. It must be pretty humiliating to look in a mirror and think "I am worth 10% of that person." And I'm not talking about a top-tier, elite programmer or engineer. And to make it worse - you have to give half your income as taxes anyway!
Why, why do people accept that? What's the point? You live like shit while the rich (and dentist is chump change in terms of rich people) enjoy life and laugh at you.
Is this really what life is about?
And by the way, it would be one thing if life was at least pleasant and government offered good services. Every single governmental service is junk. I work at a private school, and you can bet all rich people send their kids there. Why, if public school is so good, do they do that? Same for medicine, supposedly free - all rich people go to private clinic.
I tried to go the ER once. 18 hours of waiting, to get prescribed a tylenol. Gas is a real fortune, public transport shows up 50% of the time on a good day, roads are garbage, homeless are everywhere (masturbate in metro), food is so expensive a steak is a pipe dream for me, they took our guns away for no reason, now they ask for ID to go online the UK, they are about to censor the whole internet...
... and people just, like, passively accept that? "No problem sir, here's half my income so you guys can get another 30% raise (true story!). Do you need more?"
Why?
Like our hygienist - doesn't she feel humiliated doing 90% of the job and earning 10% of the salary - and then having a third (at best) stolen? Doesn't she feel like she's wasting her life, a subhuman, inferior, useless? At least as a teacher, I can pretend I do something that matters. It's a lie of course, but I can say "i help children grow up, I make a difference." And even there, no one at that school makes 10 times my salary, only the CEO earns 3-4 times at most (private school).
I don't get it. In "Discourse of voluntary servitude", La Boétie says it'S basically a) habit b) pleasure. That people get accustomed to be water carriers and slave from a young age. And that governments use pleasure to control people. But ultimately, he claims people are the most responsible for their situations. Like Orwell in 1984, when he says the pleb could always rebel and overthrow the regime, but never does.
I hate this world. Sigh.
If the dentist is not there, the hygienist has no job. A lot of offices will have several hygienists to one dentist. Is the dentist 10x more valuable to the continued operation of the establishment? Yes.
This is "the secretary is just important as the boss" thinking. They're not. If the clerical work was as important as the main job, the boss would be doing it themselves or split with an equal partner. The whole reason those specific tasks are offloaded is because they're doable by someone with less specialized skills, less training, and less experience.
Your post gets way to caught up in how it "feels" and misses reality completely. If every hygienist became a dentist, you'd have a bunch of dentists spending most of their time doing hygienist tasks, while being in competition with one another and under pressure to cut costs to compete (because the cost of dental care just skyrocketed). It would logically give rise to a specialized position to do the repetitive bulk tasks for less pay but also less investment. Which people would only accept if the effort/value proposition was amenable to them. It's not "slavery" or "humiliation," is basic-ass division of labor and a market working properly.
You're right about income taxes being bullshit though.
But back to your original question, why do you do what you do instead of having reached whatever the peak of power, money, and influence is? Are you happy being a slave? You're positing that it can only be habit or pleasure. You're also positing that you hate that. So you must incredibly successful, right? Because it'd be neither habit nor pleasure for you.
Eh sort of. Its mostly just credentialism and cronyism that provides rich people with jobs/roles. Although certain businessmen have actually created some products, most everyone wealthy is simply in a protected status. Ie they can sue or use licensing to prevent competition.
The "effort value proposition" for work is "you slave your entire life away risking injury and death just to survive, or you die here and now" Most people choose survival over suicide.