Cool but that's still wrong. If the constitution gives the president the authority to do X then it supersedes any legislation put forward. You cannot create legislation to restrict a power granted in the constitution.
The President has the authority under the IEEPA to put tariffs on whatever he pleases how he pleases. The Supreme Court made a political decision that goes against the constitution.
The Supreme Court made a political decision that goes against the constitution.
Many such cases.
Remind me again what mechanisms we have in place to check the power of the judicial branch when they go rogue like this? "Just don't appoint them in the first place" you say? Curious...
Cool but that's still wrong. If the constitution gives the president the authority to do X then it supersedes any legislation put forward. You cannot create legislation to restrict a power granted in the constitution.
The President has the authority under the IEEPA to put tariffs on whatever he pleases how he pleases. The Supreme Court made a political decision that goes against the constitution.
Many such cases.
Remind me again what mechanisms we have in place to check the power of the judicial branch when they go rogue like this? "Just don't appoint them in the first place" you say? Curious...
The check and balances are the guns but they have to be used to check and balance.
lol, illegal speech.
It sounds like your kind of speech honestly.