I don't understand ANY argument for conscription. Of all the laws on the books that are still "acceptable" in modernity from even the "progressive" crowd, the one that perplexes me the most is conscription.
For me, it's just so simple: If a government needs to force people to fight for the government then the government has no right to exist. A legitimate government should be able to raise a fully volunteer army because all the citizens the government represents wants to fight to defend this government.
Just think about it for a moment. Supposedly some evil enemy is coming to rape your women and kill all the men or enslave everyone by taking their rights away. Everyone should want to defend against that, no? If someone doesn't volunteer to fight against that then clearly they've decided that rape and death is better than... rape and death? Or, perhaps they've decided they can still live without dying for a country and they'd rather this conclusion.
How can anyone justify using force to force something to go to war and die against their will?
I hate the concept of conscription so much I think anyone who suggests it should be hanged, tbh. You want people to fight for you? Offer them an incentive then.
Outside the morality question, it's just not effective.
Here is a 30 minute video on Fragging in the Vietnam war, something that be came SUCH a problem it effectively disabled the US Army and forced them to embrace a volunteer only service.
The only kind of conscription that works is national service and that only works when there is an identifiable threat next door to your country you must be constantly watching for.
I mean, if I was conscripted, I'd probably shoot my own people and make a run for it.
Spoken like a true snowback.