I don't understand ANY argument for conscription. Of all the laws on the books that are still "acceptable" in modernity from even the "progressive" crowd, the one that perplexes me the most is conscription.
For me, it's just so simple: If a government needs to force people to fight for the government then the government has no right to exist. A legitimate government should be able to raise a fully volunteer army because all the citizens the government represents wants to fight to defend this government.
Just think about it for a moment. Supposedly some evil enemy is coming to rape your women and kill all the men or enslave everyone by taking their rights away. Everyone should want to defend against that, no? If someone doesn't volunteer to fight against that then clearly they've decided that rape and death is better than... rape and death? Or, perhaps they've decided they can still live without dying for a country and they'd rather this conclusion.
How can anyone justify using force to force something to go to war and die against their will?
I hate the concept of conscription so much I think anyone who suggests it should be hanged, tbh. You want people to fight for you? Offer them an incentive then.
I have no fear of being drafted but I do fear others being drafted against their will. A bit of empathy, I suppose. I see what's going on in Europe and how conscription has made its way into the discussion in politics in recent times and I am disgusted by the idea of it, even if it likely would never impact me.
A lot of good people died in WWII over a war that all parties fighting it should never have been fighting. I very much see the potential for another such war but I don't think such a war could occur without conscription. Conscription is just a way for tyrants to kill a bunch of men they don't want and serves no real purpose for the nation.