51
posted ago by Gizortnik ago by Gizortnik +51 / -0

Fuck this Leftist Terrorism, and fuck the corporate media & political sophists & rhetoricians making up BOLD. FACED. LIES. Please shove this in the face of any retard you encounter IRL.

This is not a discussion. This is not a debate. This is not an argument. This is not a controversy. There was none before. There is none now. The law in the US has not changed on this issue in many decades. Anyone who claims the shooting of Renee Good by Officer Jonathan Ross is anything but an obvious case of a self-defense shooting by an officer against a suspect, is a liar and a fraud. Especially, if that person has any legal background, or worse: is an attorney. They are knowingly spreading disinformation.

Ofc Jonathan Ross is a victim of a vehicular attack. Renee Good is the criminal suspect. This is not a discussion.

If you accelerate a vehicle in the direction of anyone at close range, it is reasonable for them to open fire on you in self-defense. Using Andrew Branca's 5 Principles of Self Defense we'll go over why:

  • Innocence - A law enforcement officer in the performance of their duty is innocent of a crime. Yes, ICE are "real police". Yes, ICE can arrest you for obstructing their investigations. No, this is not a debate. Anyone who has said otherwise has knowingly lied to you. This is especially true if the person who has said this to you has a background in law of any kind.
  • Reasonableness - Any reasonable person would reasonably expect that they were at a high risk of death, maiming, or hospitalization from being struck by a car.
  • Imminence - An accelerating vehicle at close range means that the use of the deadly weapon that is a fast moving vehicle, is a threat that is actively aggressing upon the victim.
  • Proportionality - A fast accelerating vehicle, a short distance from you, traveling towards you is a deadly force threat against your life and it is proportional to meet this deadly force threat with deadly force by virtue of a weapon.
  • Avoidance - A fast accelerating vehicle, a short distance from you, traveling towards you is nearly impossible to avoid easily by feet alone.

Notice, at no point, I mentioned "the suspect intended to escape". This is because it doesn't matter, so nobody cares. Anyone who has told you that this matters is knowingly lying to you, especially if they have a background in law.

Hence, law enforcement, for many years, has shot and killed people that they reasonably believed were aggressing upon them or anyone else with a vehicle. The suspect's thoughts at the time when they attacked the officer is NOT RELEVANT. The act is sufficient. This is not new. This is not the first time this has ever happened in American history. The list of comparable cases are enumerable, which is why this is settled case law.

They are so enumerable that I will now list 10 of them where no officer faced discipline for the shooting.

I'm tired of the lies and the insane gaslighting by Leftists and Communists who are raping civilization and endorsing terrorism as a moral imperative.

Just TODAY there was ANOTHER vehicle attacks on ICE agents in Portland. At this point, I wish Trump would declare Oregon and Minnesota in a state of insurrection since they are openly insistent on killing federal law enforcement.