I know I said I'd be back in November but...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Because natalism involves huge wealth transfers of money that doesn't magically start to exist.
Literally no natalist policy hasn't led to disaster.
The USSR instituted natalism in 1924, and the resulting debt from paying that family stipend caused them to over-export and led to the Holodomor.
Nazi Germany copied Stalinist natalism and racked up huge debts to Chase Manhattan which they paid off with seized Czechoslovakian assets.
Romania's "Christian Communist" natalist regime under Ceausescu led to living conditions so bad that natalist supporters were shot in the streets during the revolution.
Hungary spent 5% of their GDP on natalist policy since Fidesz won and now have one of the worst economies in the European Union. Fidesz is expected to lose re-election.
Moldova started paying birth stipends in 2025 despite being the poorest nation in Europe. They are now begging the EU for money to pay off their debts.
The UK instituted natalism under their current government, which created the largest tax burden on the average citizen in their history, even adjusted for inflation, as they removed caps on how many children you could get child benefit for.
Do you even know a definition for natalism? Because you use that word like feminist use "sexist."
Economic policy made specifically to direct wealth from the productive to the reproductive.
So you don't, because under that definition every single person in the financial sector qualifies as the financial sector produces no energy or goods.
That's the stupidest take I've ever heard.
Thank fuck you finally answered with utterly incoherent drivel. Now we can archive this so no one ever falls for your shit.