I just think it's funny that after the last few years of the supreme court striking down permanent injuctions left and right and curtailing the power of pissant district court judges... that you decided to claim total and permanent victory for the side of the perverts based on a permanent injuction granted by a pissant district court judge.
This is about social media and messaging apps. The fundamental right to free speech.
If they strike it down, the United States stands for nothing.
Ironically, it would be the biggest erosion of free speech in history, and set a precedent that shutting people up is allowed for the greater good...which would allow the Dems to finally repeat the old ACLU case that said Nazis have a right to speak, and fast track you retards to the chair.
Be careful what you wish for. Eventually your enemy will have all the power you are wielding, and they will use it to bring your end.
Can't wait for you to present your argument.
"Well, letting young people use the Internet without ID means they might say and do things we don't like."
I guess we'll see how Trump cult the SCOTUS is.
Oh I won't be litigating it.
I just think it's funny that after the last few years of the supreme court striking down permanent injuctions left and right and curtailing the power of pissant district court judges... that you decided to claim total and permanent victory for the side of the perverts based on a permanent injuction granted by a pissant district court judge.
This is about social media and messaging apps. The fundamental right to free speech.
If they strike it down, the United States stands for nothing.
Ironically, it would be the biggest erosion of free speech in history, and set a precedent that shutting people up is allowed for the greater good...which would allow the Dems to finally repeat the old ACLU case that said Nazis have a right to speak, and fast track you retards to the chair.
Be careful what you wish for. Eventually your enemy will have all the power you are wielding, and they will use it to bring your end.
Porn is not speech, and before long you'll have that demonstrated quite conclusively, pervert.
This case is not about porn, you subhuman Christcuck.