Regardless of your reductio ad absurdum, that spike of murders is a fact. Why was she carrying a weapon?
Because Rotherham.
Lower birth rates are not genocide, it's men exercising their right to walk away from a rigged game.
Low birth rates being replaced by immigrants from Africa and the Middle East is replacement.
It just turned out to be far too early and far too unreliable of a dataset to make projections off. If myocarditis had been as deadly as it usually is, and occurred at the projected rate, I wouldn't have been far off. It seems vaccine induced myocarditis isn't as deadly as the form everyone was citing studies for.
And I'm pretty sure that 90% didn't get it. But that wasn't even my main problem with your thesis, though props with seeing some of the things that were wrong with it. You assumed that as people, in your scenario, dropped dead like flies from the vaccine, people would just continue to take it, while I told you that if there were even a 2% death rate from the vaccine, the feminists you hate so much would demand firing squads because their spoiled Johnny died.
At least you admit it. A desire to declare a fake crisis and use it to beat the childless over the head.
How is it fake?
Does pedo Rowling have one?
It's funny how one paragraph can sound at least fairly reasonable, and the next one will be batshit crazy. It's as if you have two personalities fused into one.
So, she was actively involved in the purchase and dealing of drugs, as those "victims" were?
Except imports make a tiny number of the population blown out of proportion massively by grifters wanting to hide a much bigger problem. All their dumb fucking natalist subsidies get claimed at 4x rate by Islamists with all four wives claiming to be single moms. And everyone knew Islam was like this. But the idea everyone's settled on is to trash everyone's standard of living to "outbreed" them instead of holding natalism accountable, repealing birth subsidies immediately and actually taking the fight against Islam seriously.
Implying feminists have empathy is not something I agree with.
Because people making a choice of what to do with their lives isn't a crisis. The fact they don't want kids won't change no matter how hard you force it. It's malice, not policy. If they have kids they'll be bad parents. Maybe that's the point, considering the natalist movement's close ties to one J.Epstein.
Her best friend is a pedo, who wrote a book about pedophilia. But she's not. No way, the fact she runs a charity dealing with children in care (red flag 1) that had USAID contracts in Haiti (red flag 2) and is now involved in Ukraine (red flag 3) is a total coincidence.
Because Rotherham.
Low birth rates being replaced by immigrants from Africa and the Middle East is replacement.
And I'm pretty sure that 90% didn't get it. But that wasn't even my main problem with your thesis, though props with seeing some of the things that were wrong with it. You assumed that as people, in your scenario, dropped dead like flies from the vaccine, people would just continue to take it, while I told you that if there were even a 2% death rate from the vaccine, the feminists you hate so much would demand firing squads because their spoiled Johnny died.
How is it fake?
It's funny how one paragraph can sound at least fairly reasonable, and the next one will be batshit crazy. It's as if you have two personalities fused into one.
So, she was actively involved in the purchase and dealing of drugs, as those "victims" were?
Except imports make a tiny number of the population blown out of proportion massively by grifters wanting to hide a much bigger problem. All their dumb fucking natalist subsidies get claimed at 4x rate by Islamists with all four wives claiming to be single moms. And everyone knew Islam was like this. But the idea everyone's settled on is to trash everyone's standard of living to "outbreed" them instead of holding natalism accountable, repealing birth subsidies immediately and actually taking the fight against Islam seriously.
Implying feminists have empathy is not something I agree with.
Because people making a choice of what to do with their lives isn't a crisis. The fact they don't want kids won't change no matter how hard you force it. It's malice, not policy. If they have kids they'll be bad parents. Maybe that's the point, considering the natalist movement's close ties to one J.Epstein.
Her best friend is a pedo, who wrote a book about pedophilia. But she's not. No way, the fact she runs a charity dealing with children in care (red flag 1) that had USAID contracts in Haiti (red flag 2) and is now involved in Ukraine (red flag 3) is a total coincidence.