I do have friends to play games with. I just don't like collaborative games. I don't know why they're such a big thing.
What game am I supposed to name? I just named something that I felt deserved better than it got. The way the industry is going is a bad direction. It seems like someone or something is pushing them towards collaborative experiences...with Digital ID looming to make them unplayable. The cynic in me would connect those dots, but that implies power over tech that I'd rather not believe my enemy has.
Video games have always been CoLlAbOrAtIvE you fool. Even the Atari 2600 was multi-player, hell most games were multi-player only.
The only thing pushing games in a bad direction is bullshit like Fortnite and Call of Duty making a boat load of money selling slop to normiefags like you.
No, Pong was competitive. You didn't work together, you played against each other. That's my point.
I'm sorry, but Battlefield 6 isn't fun. It's not. Unless you have a full squad of people you know, it's a tedious slog where you barely affect the outcome.
It would be like if every racing game suddenly mandated that instead of getting the win yourself, everyone would be put in teams and their points would be added together, like in IRL racing. There's a reason they don't do that. It's stupid. It doesn't reward skill or intelligent play, it rewards people who personally know their teammates.
Fortnite
Ironically, I can talk about this in the same context. Introducing, Fortnite Delulu. A proximity chat enabled mode, where you work with people and form teams, where victory isn't determined by skill but by social interaction. It's so, so incredibly stupid of an idea.
The fact that only Atari game you know of is fucking Pong shows how much of a normiefag you are. You hate battlefield because you're bad at it. Simple as.
Now stop talking to me, no one ever should have let you in the gate in the first place.
You cannot be serious. Okay, how about ET? Arkanoid? How many do I have to name?
You seriously want to claim you're a real gamer when you pretend the industry didn't junk the idea of co-op multiplayer when the first 3D consoles came out with only ONE controller, which has been the norm for five generations now. It's only very recently that we've seen people talking about collaborative multiplayer games again, seemingly in the wake of Helldivers 2.
I do have friends to play games with. I just don't like collaborative games. I don't know why they're such a big thing.
What game am I supposed to name? I just named something that I felt deserved better than it got. The way the industry is going is a bad direction. It seems like someone or something is pushing them towards collaborative experiences...with Digital ID looming to make them unplayable. The cynic in me would connect those dots, but that implies power over tech that I'd rather not believe my enemy has.
Video games have always been CoLlAbOrAtIvE you fool. Even the Atari 2600 was multi-player, hell most games were multi-player only.
The only thing pushing games in a bad direction is bullshit like Fortnite and Call of Duty making a boat load of money selling slop to normiefags like you.
No, Pong was competitive. You didn't work together, you played against each other. That's my point.
I'm sorry, but Battlefield 6 isn't fun. It's not. Unless you have a full squad of people you know, it's a tedious slog where you barely affect the outcome.
It would be like if every racing game suddenly mandated that instead of getting the win yourself, everyone would be put in teams and their points would be added together, like in IRL racing. There's a reason they don't do that. It's stupid. It doesn't reward skill or intelligent play, it rewards people who personally know their teammates.
Ironically, I can talk about this in the same context. Introducing, Fortnite Delulu. A proximity chat enabled mode, where you work with people and form teams, where victory isn't determined by skill but by social interaction. It's so, so incredibly stupid of an idea.
The fact that only Atari game you know of is fucking Pong shows how much of a normiefag you are. You hate battlefield because you're bad at it. Simple as.
Now stop talking to me, no one ever should have let you in the gate in the first place.
You cannot be serious. Okay, how about ET? Arkanoid? How many do I have to name?
You seriously want to claim you're a real gamer when you pretend the industry didn't junk the idea of co-op multiplayer when the first 3D consoles came out with only ONE controller, which has been the norm for five generations now. It's only very recently that we've seen people talking about collaborative multiplayer games again, seemingly in the wake of Helldivers 2.